Category Archives: Vincent Bridges

The Bridges/Jadczyk Correspondence Part 5

From:                    Laura Knight-Jadczyk
To:                        Vincent & Darlene
Subject:                Re: Berry, Grail, Chalice etc…
Send reply to:
Date sent:             Fri, 14 May 1999 15:24:37 -0400

On 13 May 99, at 22:06, Vincent & Darlene wrote:
> 2) Parzival, Perseus and Percy – Your points on Perseus are well taken,
> but the early Rosecrucians focused on Jason as the origin point of
> Parzival myths. Just how and why is a key secret that only Fulcanelli is
> willing to take on. The link seems to be Heracles, whose labors are
> depicted on the supposedly Christian front of St. Trophime in Arles.
Funny thing:
Not long after I had had this “insight” about Perseus, I came across a book in
a used book store and, since I was “triggered” by the suggestion to look for
“the threes,” and it was about Perseus, I bought it.
Well, it is a sort of historical “fiction,” but I was positively amazed at what
this gal did. Continue reading


The Bridges/Jadczyk Correspondence Part 4

From:                    Laura Knight-Jadczyk
To:                        Vincent & Darlene
Subject:                Berry, Grail, Chalice etc…
Send reply to:
Date sent:             Thu, 13 May 1999 09:48:00 -0400

I keep coming across this place called “Berry” in your web page book, and every
time I do it “bugs” me.  Here is the reason.  Maybe you can make something out
of it because I can’t! Continue reading


Zaca Lake Saga

Background: In the late summer/early fall of 2000, Ark and Laura cancelled their proposed appearance at a “conference” organized by Vincent Bridges. (See: Retreat From Zaca) The reasons for cancellation were many, but were really not important since the cancellation was made over six weeks prior to the scheduled date of the conference. Cancelling attendance at a conference is not an unknown event in the world, happens all the time, and certainly poses no real problems. Most conference organizers simply get another speaker to fill the slot – sometimes with as little as a day’s notice – and life goes on. No biggie. However, that is not how things work out with Vincent Bridges. Continue reading


Chris Horlacher – Maple Leaf Metals and Mold, Oh My!

Chris Horlacher hopped on the defamo train about 4 years ago by announcing on Facebook that Laura is a convicted criminal…

Horlacher lying on Facebook

…. which is an absolute LIE, and very easy to research.  Laura lived in Florida for her entire life before moving to France with her European husband a few years ago.  Even if someone doesn’t have the cyber IQ of a snail darter and can’t do a simple records search for themselves, they can spring for a $20.00 criminal background check in Florida and it will show that Laura Knight-Jadczyk  DOES NOT have ANY criminal record record whatsoeverThere are not now,  nor have there ever been, any Civil Actions filed against her either… about the raffle, the house or anything else.


Since Horlacher is Net savvy enough to know how to look before he libels, one can only assume that he’s doing it on purpose.  I’m gonna take a wild guess and say it’s because Laura and Co. figured out exactly what Horlacher was all about…ohhhhh, 15 minutes or so after he opened his big, fat cyber mouth? Continue reading


Vincent Bridges, alias « Dr. Strange » : simple escroc New Age ou membre du COINTELPRO ?

Traduction et résumé : SOTT

Simple escroc New Age, ou membre du Counter Intelligence Programme ?

Le texte que va suivre est le résumé d’un rapport, établi à partir de 2001 et mis à jour jusqu’en 2008, par Laura Knight-Jadczyk au sujet de Vincent Bridges et de leurs relations débutées en 1999. Tout commença par une visite de Bridges à Laura Knight-Jadczyk, au prétexte d’un livre qu’il écrivait sur Fulcanelli, visite qui déboucha sur une relation épistolaire par courriels. Au début, Laura Knight appréciait cette personne, avec laquelle elle partageait la passion des choses « étranges » qui se passent en ce monde. Au fil du temps, cependant, le comportement de Vincent Bridge devint de plus en plus malsain et manipulateur à l’égard de Laura Knight-Jadczyk, au point qu’elle et ses proches en furent mis en danger. Ce sont finalement ces attaques qui permirent à l’équipe de Signs of the Times et de Quantum Future de prendre conscience de la réalité des psychopathes, et des traumatismes sérieux qu’ils font subir à leur entourage. Ce rapport est le fruit d’une enquête approfondie portant sur les prétentions de ce personnage.

Continue reading


The Bridges/Jadczyk Correspondence Part 3

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk <>

To: Vincent & Darlene <>
Subject: Re: A couple of comments
Send reply to:
Date sent: Tue, 11 May 1999 21:51:56 -0400

On 11 May 99, at 18:18, Vincent & Darlene wrote:

> Wow, keeping up with you is a full time job! 🙂

That’s what my husband says. He works pretty hard to keep me out of trouble!
>OK, I’ll admit it. You have me fascinated with your approach. I don’t as a
>rule have much use for channeled material. For the obvious reasons. Continue reading


The Bridges-Jadczyk Correspondence Part 2

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk <>
To: Vincent & Darlene <>
Subject: RE:Hendaye
Send reply
Date sent: Sun, 9 May 1999 21:34:58 -0400

On 9 May 99, at 18:15, Vincent & Darlene wrote:
> The stuff up on the web is actually smoke and mirrors. We
> haven’t released the good stuff yet either. Very little on the web about
> some of our discoveries, for obvious reasons.

Well, I figured that out. But it is still good work. I am still reading and making notes and the ole brain is clicking along.

I would like to reiterate the fact that I truly believe that it could be “unhealthy” to say too much. My experiences are such that I KNOW those guys are out there, that they have space/time manipulation capabilities, that they can do a LOT of things that are seemingly impossible… and about half of them are not friendly!!!> Continue reading


The Bridges – Jadczyk Correspondence Part 1

Date sent: Fri, 7 May 1999 11:49:03 -0500
From: Vincent & Darlene <>
Subject: RE:Hendaye

Dear Laura,

What a nice comment on our AMET website, and so perceptive too!

Yes, we are aware of E. Van Buren’s fascinating book, and, as you supposed, are deep into the RLC thing. However, our starting point was Fulcanelli’s book Le Mystere des Cathedrals and his chapter on the Cyclic Cross of Hendaye, which EVB quotes at great length in her preface to Refuge. In fact, EVB does little but quote Fulcanelli, giving only one piece of new information. <<He told the alchemist Canseliet ‘The time will come, my son, when you will no longer be able to work in alchemy, when it will be necessary for you to search for some country rare and blessed, privileged without doubt, and situated towards the south, beyond the frontiers.’ To others, Fulcanelli indicated that the place was Rennes, in the Aude.>> Continue reading


Vincent Bridges AKA “Dr. Strange” Tells His Life Story:

This series of emails began on April 14, 2001. It was presented, as can be seen, as a factual account of the life of one Vincent Bridges. The recipients were Ark and Laura Jadczyk and members of their online research and discussion group. The reader may wish to read how this “bio” actually checked out HERE.

Montauk, Mind Control, Magnitite and the Holy Grail, or: Who is that Shadow being and why is he following me?

First of all, let’s get one thing clear. We are all here because we chose to be here. Because we have made that choice, we’ve opened ourselves to a little more awareness than the control systems like to allow. This creates turbulence.

Our sermon for today is likely to create even more turbulence. Our topic and the conclusions we will reach are very unsettling and disturbing to be aware of; how much more disturbing then to remain ignorant or to discount the possibilities? Continue reading


“It’s your word against his…”

Quote from a Vincent Bridges fan:
Well you know Ark I read Vincent bridges website (s)yesterday and I can only tell you: it is your word against his. In spite of your analysis and data he did the same.

This is one of the saddest things about the people that get taken in by Vincent Bridges.  They THINK that it is just “your word against his,” but that is not the case.

For one thing, it should be pointed out that Vincent Bridges met me exactly TWICE.  Indeed, we had a long email correspondence which consisted mostly of Bridges pumping me for information that he twisted and used in his book, and then manipulating me in an attempt to gain  control of me, my work, my readers, my discussion group – to appropriate it to himself.   Those emails are published HERE. (You can read about the background of the beginning of this correspondence HERE.) Continue reading