Category Archives: Testimonials in English

Testimonial from Mocachapeau – Cassiopaean Forum Member

I first discovered Laura Knight-Jaczyk’s work in 2007.  I had spent over a year doing some truth seeking of my own and had become familiar with a number of topics she discusses in her books.  After reading her book High Strangeness I was very impressed with how meticulous she was in her research, and also with her insightful interpretations of the evidence she presented.  Never did she try to exclude evidence to try and fit an hypothesis, she would always try to come up with an hypothesis that would include all the evidence.  Furthermore, she never tried to claim anything as fact that could not be proven.  The honesty and objectivity inherent in her work was quite refreshing.  It was for these reasons that I decided to check out her websites, and eventually join the SOTT forum, in 2008.  I have been a member ever since.

To say that my time spent participating on the forum has helped me, would be a gross understatement.  I have been encouraged to read well-recognized books about psychology, history, health/diet and the esoteric, among other things, by many different authors.  All of the suggested reading has been chosen with the specific goal of helping people to better understand themselves, the people in their lives and the world we live in.

When I visit the forum I have the opportunity to discuss any of the topics I’ve been studying with a number of people who are doing likewise.  I can also share my experiences, ask for feedback from forum members and give feedback to others, if they ask for it.  Never has anyone tried to tell me what to do or how to think.  They simply share their observations, opinions, knowledge and they make suggestions.  What I do with them is entirely up to me.  I have never before come across a group of people with such a keen desire to learn, to help others and to respect each other’s free will.

I have learned a lot about myself, identified attitudes and behaviours of which I had not been previously aware, and this has enabled me to change the way I interact with the people in my life – particularly my family.  I have much better relationships with my wife and kids because of the time I have spent as a member of the SOTT forum.

Most importantly, everything that SOTT has to offer – the forum, Laura’s writing, the EE breathing program – is all available on-line for free.  They do not ask for any kind of payment.

It is because of all this that I find any attempt to label SOTT a “cult” simply laughable.  Well, it would be laughable if it were not for the fact that such accusations are very hurtful – not to mention libellous and defamatory – and that people have a tendency to believe them without looking into the subject themselves.

One might think that mature adults would have shed that tendency after observing the harm that is caused by the rumour mill in high school.  How many teenage girls have ended up with a reputation of being promiscuous, simply because a teenage boy tried to impress his buddies by lying about sleeping with her?  The only people that know the truth about those girls are the people who know them.

And so it is with any group accused of being a “cult” – one must find out for oneself whether the accusation is valid, or not.  In the case of SOTT, it is very easy to do so because the forum, and all their information, is open to anyone.  Why? – Because they have nothing to hide.

Part and parcel with the “cult” label is the accusation of brainwashing forum members in order to break up their families and draw them (and their money) into the cult.  Again, in SOTT’s case, I find this idea laughable.  Not only because forum members, moderators and administrators have a track record of encouraging each other to try and identify and change what they, themselves, might be doing wrong in their relationships, but also because my own personal experience with this subject confirms that track record.

In 2009 my wife and I decided to get a divorce.  We had announced our intention to both our families, and our children, and I was actually out looking for an apartment.  We both felt it was the right choice to make in the situation, but we were very worried about the pain it would cause our kids.  So I decided to share our story with the forum to see what kind of advice I would get from the same group that had helped me with simpler problems in the past.
I received a number of responses from people expressing empathy and understanding, sharing their own similar experiences, observations and some helpful advice.  I even received some thoughts from Laura, the leader and founder of the group, who could have seen this situation as an ideal opportunity to help break up a marriage (if that was the kind of thing she did).  Here is the most important part of what she wrote, which was accompanied by some other really good advice:

“…it really doesn’t seem like such a desperate situation, just one where your selfishness is exposed, and the real sufferers are your children.  Please re-read Gurdjieff’s take on “External Considering”…”

Laura pointed out what she thought might be wrong with my way of thinking, and my own behaviour.  It led me to make a closer examination of myself, and I realized that she was right.  As a result, I told my wife that I thought we might be making a mistake, and I asked her if she would like to stay together and try again.  She agreed, and we did.  Today we have a stronger, more loving relationship than ever before, partly due to my efforts to be more externally considerate of my wife.
Laura Knight-Jadczyk was instrumental in helping me save my marriage, not trying to destroy it.  Judging from what I have observed of her interaction on the forum over the past three and a half years, I can say that helping others the way she helped me is simply her nature.  And she never asks for anything in return.  In my humble opinion, that is not the sort of behaviour one would expect from a manipulative “cult” leader.

Whenever I think back at that rough period in my marriage, I think of how grateful I am to Laura, and how lucky I am to have found her.

Share

Testimonial of Nathan – Cassiopaean Forum Member

My name is Nathan and I’m a writer from Australia. In 2001, I came across the Cassiopaea website while in search of information on my father’s psychological condition; information that was noticeably sparse in Western psychiatry literature: psychopathy. At the time, Laura Knight-Jadczyk had experienced several close encounters with such dangerous individuals and had skillfully dug up and pieced together what little data existed of their condition.

For many years I looked on with interest at Laura’s impressive bibliography of work and not to mention the insightful articles on the Cassiopaea and Signs of the Times websites, but it wasn’t until later that I returned to the Wave and the Adventure series with renewed interest (they were and are still available for free). Like many others I soon became a daily reader of the Signs of the Times website (appropriately sub-titled “The world for people who think”) because I wanted to keep up with what was really taking place on this crazy planet of ours.

In 2006, I joined the Cassiopaea forum and found myself in what can only be described as the exact opposite to a cult or religion (which includes New Age religions too). Pathological thinking and blind belief had been exchanged with a collective goal to learn as much as possible about the real world and ourselves by becoming involved in gathering and sharing objective data. I realised that I’d stumbled upon a fellowship of knowledge and growth, the sort of thing you’d see depicted in fantasy or science fiction movies as an ancient civilization, wise beyond its years, kind and helpful yet clever and humble. But this was very real and very human. And I never looked back.

Laura, her family and close associates are renowned for their grappling of controversial and perplexing topics that would overwhelm or unnerve the bravest of journalists and researchers in a heartbeat. It saddens me that this era of human history might pass yet again in bloodshed, unaware that its greatest heroes were fighting the real battle. The one against lies and inhumanity.

Share

More pathological rants from “Jean”

After my publication of Jean’s confession (which quite graphically shows his appalling inner landscape), I still have to face his desperate attempts to intimidate me and my friends (Laura, her family) and to destroy my confidence and freedom of choice, choice which was to start a new life away from him. It is indeed an intense learning experience, one which I hope will help readers to deepen their knowledge about the inherently pathological nature of some people, and how it can affect each and every one of us.

I’ve copied below his last email, which I’ll be addressing step by step. As usual, I’m sharing this data anonymously, removing any personal reference, etc., because my point is not to make his life more difficult, but to give readers an opportunity to decipher ‘psychopathological’ language and mode of functioning. These data, taken from real life, offer a great learning opportunity. It’s also a good exercise for me, as having to look at his sick rants with the critical distance needed for objective assessment – to look at it clinically and publish my comments for others to read – somewhat relieves the anxiousness and apprehension of having to read his threats and attempts at intimidation on my own, without anyone to bear witness to his twisted thinking.

Now, if it is for me to think how to proceed.

Here there is enough to start several counts of accusation: [against LKJ and her family]

–Public defamation [referring to the publication of my testimonial and his confession]

It is not public defamation, since only pseudonyms were used – despite the obvious fact that more than one person near Jean might benefit from learning about the indecent, predatory and dehumanized behavior he has shown. It is also true, written in his own words – which he does not deny – and given to me at the time, with the mention:

BTW, while formatting my computer, I forgot to save the 20 pages ‘filth’ I sent you. So you’re the only one to own the SOLE document. I think it’s not useless for you to be aware of that. For you to judge!

Apparently, he forgot that he had saved a draft version of that ‘document’, written in an email draft, with all the identifiers intact.

–Abuse of Power

The Sott/Cass owners have been persecuted by the police based on his lies, and for more than a year, I’ve been living in constant fear and stress SIMPLY because he wasn’t capable of accepting that, one day, I took the decision to start a life without him, after years of what can minimally be described as psychological abuse by a pathological mind devoid of any real consideration for my well-being and the well-being of others. Talk about abuse of power.

Maybe the only ‘abuse of power’ is that which makes someone think that others are property rather than human beings free to decide if they want to continue a life with someone. Is that so difficult to understand? Is it so difficult for him to start his own life without further undermining the confidence and freedom of the person he professed to ‘love’?

–Opposing the right of reply

 

The right of reply has always been open to Jean – as it is to anyone who signs up on this blog or on Sott.net and decides to leave a comment. In fact, it would be interesting to see what he comes up with. It’s easy to harass, lie to and manipulate a lonely prey, but far less easy to do so in a place with many witnesses who can – and will – point out the insanity of his ‘reasoning’.

–Intimidation by force

Yeah right… I can quote many examples of ‘intimidation by force’ by this man. For instance, this particular bit of BS which he sent me (before I published my testimonial) after an ‘argument’ over the diet of the children – Jean blames me for imposing ‘restrictions’ on them. For him, restriction means questioning foods that are harmful for health, like cow milk and sugar. (BTW, when Jean was still living with us, he agreed that cow milk was bad for health… yeah, you’ve gotta love those changes of mask).

Anyway, in this extract, Jean threatens to reveal the ‘truth’ about me to my friends and family IF I refuse to talk to him (meaning: if I refuse to shut up, listen to and agree with his nonsensical word salad, which BTW displays an utter ignorance regarding health and diet – but we’ll come to that later, stay tuned):

If you accept to discuss, to not elude issues, then we can advance. If you don’t, I’ll be obliged to expose the truth, the so misused truth, to everyone who believed they supported you for good reasons, whereas all you did was lying to everyone, to yourself, to the children, to me.

The last sentence is particularly telling, in terms of intimidation, distortion and projection. Keep in mind that the above nonsense and accusations of ‘lying’ are coming from a man who plotted behind my back with his good friend in order to ‘get me’, who hacked into my mailbox, who stole all the data from my hard drive, who phoned my mother and one of my friends behind my back, who went to the police to report I was in a ‘cult’, etc. etc. and who, once, wrote this about me:

‘Jean’: All I wish is to have teeth sharp enough to bite her, argh, i’d like to inject a poison into her, so that she will beg me after. Seriously, she’s far more moronic than I thought. The absolute trap would be: we plan to visit her together, and then you bail out.

Friend: No worries for me, but you can’t do that twice, she’s not stupid “:)”

‘Jean’: Yes she, she is very stupid. As naive as she is, she’ll never think that we’re talking about her, and that we plan things behind her back… In her mind, when people chat together it must mean they’re flirting, so (…) she doesn’t think straight, remember.

But he doesn’t show the slightest shame or contrition for displaying such ugliness of mind. No! Instead, he’s accusing others of all the things he’s been guilty of literally for all his life.

I think his functioning is so deeply pathological that he’s not capable of even imagining other ways outside of his own. Other ways that don’t imply coercion, control, lying, maneuvering… again, projecting onto others what he is inside. Typical.

–Infringement of copyright

It would be interesting to see Jean taking legal actions to defend as intellectual property a confession of horrible acts devoid of any humanity and moral decency.

–The methods of black propaganda worthy of the Stasi are well known in cult circles:
Black Propaganda http://www.anti-scientologie.ch/definitions.htm #

It seems he doesn’t take into account that the above very well fits with his own behavior towards me :

– Blackmail and emotional manipulation.

– Putting  in serious doubt my ethics and personal choices when seeing they no longer fit his own purposes.

– Hostility to the possibility that I broaden the scope of my relations, if the latter are not closely controlled and managed by him.

I made the CHOICE of leaving a man who psychologically abused me and continues to do so in the most blatant way, with his blackmail and threats – thereby proving by his very actions that all the warnings my friends gave me before I left him were spot on.

You see, in his twisted mind, there can be no other life for me except under his control. If my choices don’t fit his views of how I should behave and what I should decide, it means I’m controlled/influenced/manipulated through « black propaganda » (and why not Nazi propaganda, since we’re at it?)

–I informed myself.

What you do not understand is that what happens is exactly what I wanted. Sometimes the best way is not to play:)

And now the game starts. [You gotta play hardball, here]

Notice the pathological gambling and how he seems to revel in his little manipulation games, without the slightest awareness of the suffering that his harassment and lies are causing me and all of my friends.

Zero empathy, zero capacity for remorse, zero capacity for introspection, zero capacity for self-doubt and assessment of his actions.

–The ultimate proof that this is a destructive cult, the worst.
The ultimate proof that they manipulate you and you do exactly the worst infamy they require of you.
How they control you? You also have confided in? You’re afraid.

I’ve indeed often been ‘afraid’ during the past years – afraid of HIS behaviour, which, sometimes, when we were still together, I used to think verged on insanity. Now, I don’t think it just ‘verges’ on insanity.

Where is his proof of me being manipulated? What infamy? Having left him and exposed his true self (even if anonymously) is certainly considered as an infamy for him.

Jean seems unable to understand what friendship and concern for others means: for him it’s all a power game where he has to win at all costs. In his world of extreme competition and control, there is no room for honest friendship and support among human beings, and so he blames my friends and myself of doing what he himself does – since for him, controlling behaviour and manipulation are the only options available. A truly scary and chilling inner landscape.

–You also have given them information about you and you would not want this to be disclosed publicly.
Sure, they would surely publish it if you removed yourself from their hold.
AND SO WHAT!

He just can’t let go of the idea that I just might have a mind of my own, that I just might have made choices of my own and that those choices included getting him out of my life (which is the main thing he can’t stand) and, of course, all of that HAS to be due to cultic control!! In his mind, only a ‘guru’ more powerful than him, with better manipulation and control techniques than his own, could be able to ‘break the hold’ he thought he had on me.

Anyway, Jean is saying that ‘they’ (ah, you’ve got to love that mythical – dare I say ‘conspiratorial’? – threatening, nebulous ‘they’) coerced me into writing and publishing my testimonial, and that if I had ‘removed myself from their hold’, they would have ‘revealed’ those things I talk about, probably as an attempt to ‘break’ me – as if there was anything in this testimonial that could cause me trouble if people knew about it.

In fact, IF, as a result of reading that testimonial, people who are supposed to be my friends were to choose to keep away from me, well it’d just mean they’re NOT true friends and are just hypocrites more interested in the appearance of friendship than by sincerity, honesty and true caring. So why should I care about losing such ‘friends’?

 

–The truth is that we have much less to fear from them than they do from us.
This is obvious if not – they would not feel obliged to go that far.

Here comes his pitch. He’s now so sure that he has made me afraid of my friends that he and I have miraculously became a ‘WE’! Clever manipulation technique… Take note, reader, this is a perfect textbook case of pathological thinking and ploys.

The idea that I never want to see him again, never want to hear his voice, have to read his crap, think about him, etc., is impossible! Only a powerful cult that has super mind-control methods could have turned me against him!

–It’s unfortunate that you find yourself enlisted in this mess, you did not deserve that.

Poor me… I could have been living with him and his perversions and rage forever…

After defaming me, insulting me (“wh***”, “you could not last 3 days without me”, “you’re worse than the day I met you”) now he’s saying that “I didn’t deserve that”.

This looks like the psychopath’s MO: when words don’t match actions, when they confuse your mind and drive you crazy with their contradictory statements and behavior – one day very nice and utterly charming, the next day treating you like a piece of s**t and acting all surprised that you’re even upset by it.

Once he stayed away for three days and was lying asleep on the bed when she came in midmorning. “Where have you been?” she cried. “I’ve been so worried. Where were you?”

He looked sour as he woke up. “Don’t ever ask me that,” he snapped. “I won’t have it.”

“What?”

“Where I go, what I do, who I do it with – it doesn’t concern you, Elsa. Don’t ask.”

He was like a different person. But then he seemed to pull himself together, shook the sleep off, and reached out to her. “I know it hurts you,” he said in his old gentle way, “but I think of jealousy as a flu, and wait to get over it. And you will, baby, you will.” Like a mother cat licking her kitten, he groomed her back into trusting him.

Robert Hare, This Charming psychopath

–And I speak not of children.
But this will be avoided …
Just need to wait a few weeks.
As I said before, all you have is to follow the news.

If you really have friends in the group, tell them to run and protect themselves with a few documents.
It could be that spectacular … EPIC FAIL.

That is supposed to be conveyed to my friends and make them shake in their boots.

And what ‘group’ anyway? What is he talking about IN FACT? I know a forum which I’m a member of. I’ve offered to do translations for Sott and Pilule Rouge because I enjoy it. It happens that, on SOTT and on the forum, I have a group (there’s that suspicious, conspiratorial word again… “you have what? ‘a group’?” *shudder*) of friends who, because they supported me in my decision to end this caricature of a relationship, he’s now bent on destroying. Is it what he’s talking about?

His use of the term ‘group’ – without giving any name or any indication that he’s actually talking about individuals – not only serves to protect himself from defamation charges, but also to dehumanize Laura and her family (since, of course, it’s these people he’s targeting and talking about, first and foremost). By referring to these individuals as ‘the group’, he wants to convey to his ‘audience’ the impression of some vague, threatening and tentacular entity operating and controlling their ‘robot-followers’ from some obscure (maybe underground?) HQ.

Talking about these human beings as ‘the group’ (a euphemism for ‘the cult’) incites the unaware reader to see them as not human – therefore not capable of suffering, of emotions, of pain – and to view them as that threatening entity whose only aim is to ‘control’ and ‘enslave others’. For what ends? We don’t know. ‘They’ don’t have money, ‘they’ give EE classes for a ridiculously low fee, ‘they’ make available tons of material for free through the forum and the Cass websites, ‘they’ work all day like crazy. Maybe, in Jean’s mind, ‘they’ are just demons sucking at people’s soul? It might sound comical, but we’re not far from that, actually. Shades of the Inquisition… as the good crusader that he is, Jean probably imagines ‘them’ burning at the stake while I look at him with adoring eyes:

Just look at how one man can outstrip a clique of impostors

Yeah, by ‘one man’, he’s means himself.

And this is this same guy who’s accusing others of being ‘megalomaniac gurus’. Talk about projection again. Yawn.

–You have a choice to make, and most important of all your life.

Like I didn’t already make that choice by ditching him?

This dramatic tone is supposed to make me shake in my boots too. I’m not far from feeling like in a Star Wars movie. Oh wait, he actually believes Laura is Darth Vader!

This is what he wrote once on the now defunct GLP thread:

In our view, transformation is more like that of Anakin Skywalker into Darth Vader. Their assessment of life has been reworked from a borderline personality who has rocked in fanaticism.

- Do not drown yourself in too much information, intellectualization and rationalization.

It’s clear that Jean resents me for getting informed (mainly about psychopathy, narcissism and other pathological disorders…no wonder).

But anyway, since I’m supposed to be controlled by ‘the cult’, I have no will or mind of my own anymore, right? So how could I be capable of ‘intellectualization’ and reasoning, and to get ‘too much information’? I’m just supposed to follow orders and obey through threats and coercion, right?

So make up your mind buddy. Am I mind-controlled, or am I thinking too much? Mmm, maybe I’m actually mind-controlled into thinking too much?

It’s just the question of how now you have the power to help others.
Directly, bypassing the will of another.

That’s truer than he realizes, though not the way he thinks!

–Accept that you have that power.

No one have never had as much as you, decide alone.

I guess what he is saying is that I have the power to join him in declaring that Laura runs a cult that mind-programmed me. Which in the end is submitting to HIS power: (emphatic tone) “If you don’t think, feel, and say like me, it means you’ve been programmed and I’m gonna destroy you because you’re on the Dark Side.”

Where have we seen that one already?

It is just inconceivable that people like Jean – who are clearly mentally disturbed, based on their utter obsession for… well, for anything that makes them tick… last target being Laura and her family being a “cult” – have the slightest legal support to achieve their purposes that are far from having any degree of moral decency.

Share

Dangerous Liaisons: French Woman’s Abusive Ex-Partner Screams “Cult!”

Despite the fact that psychopaths devastate everyone in their path including the women and children who love them, why have clinicians not seen fit to study and write about the single most obvious source of insight into this issue: the survivors of intimate relationships with psychopaths? The study of any disease involves carefully collecting and examining its symptoms, and psychopathy is definitely a societal disease. Even our legal system gathers information about criminals by taking testimony from on-site, first hand witnesses. So again, I ask: why is there no clinical material about – much less interest in – the psychopath’s partner?

I think that one answer is: therapists don’t recognize her as a victim of psychopathy because they usually don’t recognize him as a psychopath! On the rare occasion when a psychopath’s victim is identified, she is lumped together with more typical domestic violence survivors; or labeled as codependent, a relationship/sex addict, and/or assumed to be suffering dependent personality-disorder. These inaccurate and often biased explanations of pathological love relationships have neither helped victims find specific treatment for their unique relationship dynamics and aftermath symptoms, nor have they contributed (as they could) to our knowledge of psychopathy itself. It’s a travesty within the clinical profession that the victims are not more readily identified or better understood and that this rich source of vital information has not been mined.

Sandra L. Brown, The Unexamined Victim: Women who Love Psychopaths

I’m not the sort of person who likes to expose her life on the Internet for everyone to read. I don’t feel the need to do that in order to know that I exist. What I’m about to write here is for the sole purpose of setting facts straight regarding my separation from a pathological man who, because he couldn’t accept his own responsibility in the utter failure of our relationship, has devoted himself to attacking my friends: Laura Knight-Jadczyk, her family and her life’s work, accusing them of being a cult who ‘took me away’ from him.

Bear in mind that this was not just an ‘informal accusation’. He went all the way to file an official complaint with the Police Judiciaire in Toulouse, who are now investigating Laura and her associates as if they were criminals, with NO proof at all. I will not get into all the details here, but you can read them [here].

All I want to say is that I am REALLY appalled at the fact that the authorities seem to have listened to my ex, taken false and defamatory ‘claims’ as facts, AND, have never even asked me – the alleged victim – what REALLY happened! They must think I am stupid, gullible and dumb! Well, for those who are interested, (the police would seem to not be interested in the truth), you can read what I really have to say here.

It’s perfectly logical for pathological people to react that way when they’re ‘dumped’. For them, people are not free-thinking, feeling human beings; they are property. They ignore the meaning of ‘freedom of association’, which includes the right to NOT associate with them. This kind of individual refuses you the simple right to NOT associate with them anymore, be it now or ever. This utter lack of consideration tells a lot about how they think about their partners and children: they are prey. For them, you’re just a piece of meat without any will of your own, without a brain, without existence apart from being under their control.

I am utterly shocked that the person who used to be my ‘partner’ is using other people – my friends, the Jadczyks and their work – to try to get me back by spreading his slander; to get me back or, if he can’t, to destroy me along with everybody else that I hold dear, including, and especially, my children. I’m outraged that he refuses me the legitimate right to lead my life without him, independently, and to befriend whomever I want.

I’m also writing this as an illustration of how pathology works within relationships. I hope this will serve as a warning to other women who are at risk – and most women are – of falling prey to this type of individual. (See Women Who Love Psychopaths by Sandra Brown, MA)

As human beings trying to survive in an often harsh world, we’re all wounded to one extent or another, all craving for affection and love – and that perfectly normal need is exploited by pathological individuals – most often psychopaths – to lure their victims into their web.

In order for people to understand how, and why, some women (and sometimes men) come to end up in pathological relationships with sick individuals, I need to give a bit of background on myself to provide some context.

I had an apparently normal childhood by current social standards – which means there wasn’t any apparent abuse or other developmental issues. I was not beaten up by my mother (who divorced when I was around 4), I didn’t have alcoholic parents, I was good at school, I had friends, my mother took care of me, my grandmother loved me and cared for me, and so on. Yes, I was often unsure of myself, sensitive, shy and introverted, which caused me at some point to be bullied by other kids. But, who isn’t bullied at some time or another during childhood? It’s something quite common and you learn to cope with it soon enough.

So, everything looked normal and nice enough in my family and in my life in general, except for one thing. When I was around 5 (my parents were already divorced), my father molested me. From what I remember, it happened only once, in my mother’s home; she was away, and we were waiting for her.

I suppose it strongly affected me (which child wouldn’t be affected at being betrayed and abused by the very person they are supposed to trust completely?) since it always stayed engraved in my mind. I never told my mother about it. After that, one day he came to pick me up for the weekend, and as I showed strong reluctance to go with him, he just walked out the door, and I never heard from him again. I’ve learned recently that he got into a big a argument with his parents years ago, and that he cut all contact with them. Seems to be his modus operandi. I actually don’t think it was the molestation that was the problem so much as it was the abandonment – or the two elements combined together.

Like many children who experience abandonment, I felt that it was my fault and I wasn’t worthy of love. Combined with the lack of a good father model, it affected me and was to run in the background for most of my life. I suspect this lack of a healthy father figure was the thing that would make me seek out unhealthy relationships with men when I’d grown up. But how many other women have similar stories to tell? A lot, I think.

My interactions with other members of the male sex were about par for the course among most women. What we now call abuse went on in my childhood – with a boy who forced me to kiss him (with the tongue) when I was around 5 or 6 as we ‘played’ together and he wanted to pretend to ‘make love’ (he was 3 years older than me) – it happened several times. Then, there was bullying at school because I was introverted, good at studies and ‘bad at sport’. When I was 15, when we were on holidays in Turkey, and we had some ‘massages’ in a Turkish bath, this ‘massagist’ virtually molested me in front of other people who probably didn’t notice it. And then, still in Turkey, an exhibitionist member of the hotel staff showed his penis to my friend and me – we ran, giggling, pretending he was coming after us. While we laughed at the time, it was a traumatizing first view of the adult male reproductive organ. Other girls might have fought back, maybe given him a slap in the face (I’m talking about the massagist) – I didn’t dare to react. I didn’t even comprehend what was happening to me.

Then, when I was a bit older, there were the ‘boyfriends’. The first one taught me love is not a fairy tale a la Romeo and Juliet. Instead, it was a continuous series of ‘small traumas’ (although I did not realize it was trauma nor abuse at the time), actually very common things that a lot of girls and women must endure every day. And all that time, I kept my mouth shut about these ‘small acts’ of sexual abuse. When you think about it, it’s kind of crazy – ‘How could she let them do that?’ ‘How come she didn’t react?’ Because I was taught not to react, not to make a fuss of anything. And I was ashamed. Ashamed that there was something about me that brought about these violations of my body and person. After all, the victim is taught that, in some way, she asked for it. That she must have ‘deserved’ it.

During my teenage and early adulthood years, I got into the Goth culture, vampires and things like that. I even cut myself, like many teenagers (mostly girls, apparently) do nowadays – you just want to look good and be loved, but as you cannot be loved since you’re despicable to yourself, you wear a mask, create a false self in order to be accepted. Though that kind of behaviour might be seen as self-destructive – and in a sense, it is – I never was suicidal. I suppose I just wanted people to see me, notice me. Expressing myself in this way was a way to rebel and get out all the anger and self-loathing I’d accumulated in years, and punish myself for the flaws I felt must be a part of me. Extraverts seem to pour it all out in positive ways, introverts turn everything inside, and express their anger in a negative way. Very common amongst youngsters, I know now.

I persuaded myself that dark romanticism was a mode of artistic expression, a way to stand out. I had friends in the ‘beaux arts’ and saw myself as belonging to an alternative culture. I wanted to project the image of someone who hates everyone and everything so nothing could hurt me. It was a way to wear a mask and refuse to grow up. Among teenagers, it is a very puerile and common attitude even though some might express it in less controversial ways. This ‘dark behavior’ increased for a couple of months during a transition phase after I left university and discovered the Internet. Hidden behind my computer, I could play the rebel and troll anonymously; a very convenient ‘steam venting therapy’. I wrote many stupid things in newsgroups, pretending to adopt a philosophy a la Sade (from the Marquis de Sade). It’s embarrassing to read what I wrote back then now that I’m older, but the fact is, I was just a girl hungry for affection and wondering about her future, going about it in all the wrong ways. But I’ve grown up a lot since then.

As a true friend (Laura) recently wrote to me, after I talked about these experiences during that rather brief period of my life which mostly consisted of reading Goth books and trolling on the Internet, posting BS in newsgroups:

‘You have to understand that we all do the best we can with what we have and based on what we know at any given time. When you were doing all that stuff, you sincerely thought that it was the way love was (or the only love you deserved) and the way to get it. Okay, you know different now. I suspect you know different because of your children more than anything else. And you have put forth enormous efforts to pull out of that pit so that your children can have a wholesome life and be loved in a clean and positive way. You have dealt with some incredible obstacles and you should be patting yourself on the back for some of that, not beating yourself up over what a jerk you were when you were young. I used to do that a lot myself, so I know how it feels. There have been times when I thought about stuff from my past and just wanted to jump out the window. But someone always reminds me that those were programs that I learned – a false personality – that grew around me to protect me from pain.

Okay, so you had this false personality to protect you. You did things that – in their own way – helped you to survive. Why can’t you just love that girl for doing the best she could to survive in impossible conditions? And if that girl hadn’t done some of those things, you would not have survived. You DID survive, you are a GOOD person and a good mother and thank god you did survive.

So love her even in her ignorance and helplessness to do anything different.

If you want to be angry at anything, be angry at the system that rules our world and makes people’s lives like that. Be angry at the psychopaths that run the show on this planet. And stay determined to not let them beat you, because you are all those kids have to teach them how not to do the same.’

Of course I realize now that this self-sabotaging process was unconscious. Consciously, I wanted a harmonious relationship with a good guy, but unconsciously I picked up manipulative, abusive and ‘tortured’ men because they presented an image which resonated well with my own vision of how love should be: painful and with continual threat of abandonment. The fact that these men projected an image of protector, of a punishing and demanding father substitute also attracted me. I couldn’t imagine any other possibility.

Looking back now, I can see that this behaviour – including the fascination for ‘dark men and dark stuff’ was the result of childhood trauma and abandonment by my father, and I never realised up until recently that these internal states were very common among other women. I always felt guilty about it, that I was being bad and ‘dark’, and thus deserved to ‘suffer’. I didn’t realize that by picking up the wrong men – men I perceived as dark, tortured souls – I was in fact trying to save someone else who was as dark as possible as a means of redeeming myself. I also didn’t realize that I was not really dark. But I wanted myself to appear as such, because I thought that was what I was inside. How could it be otherwise? My father abused me, then left me, so I felt pretty worthless.

I met this man that this article is about – let’s call him ‘Jean’ – about 12 years ago, over the Internet. We started as friends, and would get together as a couple only 3 years later. He contacted me after he saw one of my posts on a Usenet forum. We started a correspondence by email. The fact that he was an older man responding to a post by an angst-ridden post-teenager should have been a big warning!

From the start, I found the way he expressed himself somewhat odd and off. Something didn’t feel exactly right about him, but I just thought he was an older, more experienced guy interested in Goth culture, with whom I could have exciting conversations. If you are also a victim of a pathological person like my ex, you probably know from your own experience how easy it is to ignore those intuitive ‘red flags’ about someone, when our lives are being ruled by our past wounds and fear.

During the course of our email exchanges, he quickly started to talk about his life, his first girlfriend (a relationship which, he claimed, had really ‘affected’ him. He was quite obsessed about it, often bringing it up – later I would realise that obsession was one of his main traits of character), and how he was unhappy with his current wife. He seemed to fit that image of the tortured guy that I somehow sought. He was older than me, which fitted my idea of a father figure, supposed to be more experienced, wiser, stronger, more trustworthy, more caring, etc.

At the beginning, I wasn’t attracted to him – I was too busy being in ‘love’ with another guy. But that relationship didn’t work out, and there was this man… He was always ‘there for me’, listening to me, sending me music tapes and books, inviting me to the restaurant (while still married), showing understanding, always willing to help. (Sounds too good to be true? Yes, it was.) We were friends (we communicated mostly by email or by phone), but I kind of knew he wanted more than a friendship, and he would never be satisfied with just being friends. I ended the interaction for some time, but contacted him again after I broke up with my then boyfriend. Bad decision, for sure, but I suppose I wanted to be reassured, comforted, that I needed to speak to someone – to a friend who would ‘understand me’. It was gratifying – though sometimes highly oppressive and disturbing – to receive so much attention from someone.

We’d often have arguments over the nature of our relationship. He wanted more, in such a possessive way that it made me want to withdraw, and we would play cat and mouse. Once, after an argument, he said he felt really bad, like he had reached a breaking point. He mentioned his dark past, how it had affected and prevented him from living a fulfilling emotional life and I was the key to unlocking his heart, giving him hope, blah blah. I fell into that pity trap.

Here was a man willing to bare his soul for me, who trusted me enough, or so I thought, to tell his darkest secrets to me. I felt I had to help him get it all out and heal. A lot of women are like that. I’m no exception. But what I was ignorant about at the time, was that I was filling in the blanks, like many other victims, for what he was NOT saying. Once again, ignorance of pathology is dangerous.

He told me about his childhood and young adulthood. Most of his confessions centered on his failure at relationships with women, and were very sexually loaded. Everything centered around sex. Some facts were really disturbing, but I explained it away by the fact that he had done what he had done because he suffered – that’s what he told me. The emphasis was on HIS suffering; not on the ones he had made to suffer. I couldn’t see it at the time, because I was still quite young, immature and inexperienced, and totally ignorant of pathology and how it expresses itself. Those realisations would come much later, through the reading of books and sharing of experience between other women (some from the Cassiopaea forum, some from other forums and websites on the Net who had lived through similar experiences).

I still have in my possession a truly horrifying ‘confession’ he sent me years ago, where he presented himself as the victim in a series of the most revolting escapades you can imagine. I’m going to publish it separately so that the reader can have a very good idea of the mental landscape of this kind of person. He’s so good at manipulating that I think even women who are not wounded (though most of them are) but have a tender heart, would have fallen into the trap and taken pity on him, as I did after reading this truly awful revelation. Given my ignorance at the time and my youth, having no man in my family who could have warned me against him and no healthy role model to let me know how abnormal he really was, it’s easy to see how I was fooled.

But, this is how he works: he goes after lonely women. He goes after what he perceives as weak: girls, young women, children, single mothers (his ex-wife) – mainly women with soft hearts and strong needs for loving and being loved.

In retrospect, it becomes perfectly understandable why he has chosen to attack Laura and her family with such rage: he hates people – and he particularly hates strong and determined women. He perceives strong women as a threat to his manipulations, to his ‘power’ over others. He preys on ‘girls’ and children because he thinks they’re easy to manipulate. I was a girl, who turned into a woman, and that is what he could not tolerate because it put an end to his control over me. And he hates the people who helped me the most with all the fury of a spoiled child having a tantrum. He can’t stand that I don’t need him, that I have no feeling for him anymore, other than anger and disgust towards what he has done and what he is.

If it weren’t it for real men that I came to know through the Cassiopaea forum (where pathological types are ejected rather quickly) and who became friends, as well as others I meet every day and perceive with the eyes of an adult instead of a wounded child, I would have despaired of men, after my experience with him and all the deviants I met along my way to adulthood – to womanhood.

About his confession that I am also publishing, as mentioned already… it’s been really painful to go through that filth again, to think of all the victims he created on his destructive path through this world – like his ex-girlfriend, whom he met when she was still a teenager (and who was apparently already fragile), and who is now psychologically damaged… so damaged that her own mother doesn’t want anyone to talk to her about him ever again. According to a Private investigator’s report, this mother described Jean as a very dangerous man who had beaten her daughter up. During an incident, her daughter had run to her house to escape him, and Jean had run after her. There, he had thrown objects around, and begun to cut himself with glass.

And about his ex-wife, well, she threw him out. According to the information I have received, the police had to be called because he was not willing to go when asked. These types, once they have you in their web, won’t let you go that easily. If you’re alone, with no man in your family to protect you or a network of reliable, true friends to help you out, it’s even more difficult.

I wish I had had the knowledge and the courage to talk to these women – his other victims – before. But as you may know if you too are a victim, this type of man does everything to isolate you, to depict himself as the victim, and you are prevented from seeking out other women to talk about it. In the past, it was common for people to gather together and exchange observations and data. Nowadays, it is labeled as ‘gossip’. And hence, we go round and round, in isolation and fear, not really networking with anyone.

The purpose of this testimonial is to put an end to this. I want all the victims that have unfortunately crossed this individual’s path to know who he really is. And it is my hope that many other victims, potential victims and people who have suffered from pathologicals like him, will be able to learn from my mistakes and heal, as I am doing myself.

Looking deeply into the psychology of pathological individuals who prey on women is not easy. But I can assure you that it is extremely liberating. I want to warn readers, especially women, who are going to read his confession, that it’s disgusting and sickening. It’s not easy reading – it all focuses on sex and the objectification of women. It describes incest and sexual abuse. But you see, it’s so twisted and full of ‘hooks’ that if you’re young and have no direct – or even theoretical – experience of pathology, you fall for it, you end up empathizing with the monster because he presents himself as a victim, and does it oh so well. Women who have been the victims of such men will understand what I’m talking about. It’s all about pity, the most effective weapon the psychopath has in his arsenal.

As I said, I’m sharing this confession publicly, because I think it can help other women, potential or ex-victims of pathologicals, to learn, from the inside, how such predators operate. The confession written by ‘Jean’ – even if we suspect he lied a lot about the role he played in various dramas, or his level of responsibility, or even how far he really went in various situations – is invaluable material as it allows us to get a look inside the mind of a human predator.

I should also note that ‘Jean’s’ confession ended with a love declaration for me and how he had been so full of hatred, how he had hurt his own humanity and how now that he had met me, he wanted to do good. I fell for it. I really pitied him and thought he was so courageous to confess all that horrible stuff to me.

This is what I wrote him after reading it:

No, this is not expression, this is vomit: you vomit your bile, your hatred, your bitterness, etc. you spit out everything that you can’t stomach, which is smothering you. You take that weight off, everything that’s been piling up on you and which is polluting your soul. Now you’re lighter, you’ll be able to express yourself at last. Am I right here?

Something started to grow in me. The image of someone who had been on the ‘wild side’ but who wanted to redeem himself appeared to me as stimulating enough while safe at the same time, since after all, he had supposedly changed, and this was just stuff he had done a long time ago and now it was over. So there was no need to be concerned and afraid, right?

I really want to highlight the fact that he really got to me through my own need of a father. How many women are like that? And how many men take advantage of that need to be loved and supported, putting on the mask of the ‘good man’ – the caring, attentive, gentle, ‘I’ll be there for you’ one – listening to you, making you trust them, confide in them, tell them all your secret needs and fears? The more information they can get, the better to manipulate you. And you’re so young and eager for that father you never had, you’re so willing to trust… well, that is how they get you.

In turn, they will share how they, too, have been hurt by their past, how they’ve been manipulated and used by other woman to whom they gave their heart. And of course, all other women are worthless while you, alone, are The One.

I recently found out that, when his plans to get me weren’t working so well (after all, it took years), he was playing the same trick with other young women which he had contacted through some Goth newsgroups and starting to tell about his ‘past’ in the same way he was telling me!

Going through old files, I also recently found some disturbing email exchanges between ‘Jean’ and his friend/confident at the time (a woman whom he tricked into thinking he was a poor lonely heart wanting to help, and I was just a stupid jerk for daring to not succumb to his ‘charms’). These emails were written while I was in London. His friend was to visit me (I knew her a little, through emails and phone), but what I didn’t know then is that they secretly planned to come together. Reading this exchange makes my blood run cold:

‘Jean’s’ friend: if I phone her and ask her to wait at the station, she’s gonna suspect you’re here too.

‘Jean’: Make sure you both settle things together. I will pretend that I don’t know anything, and claim I learned about it ‘at the last minute’, as usual.

Friend: I can keep that good influence, but imagine if she tells me, ‘sorry I don’t want to see him’. What do I do?

‘Jean’: Nothing, or a slap in the face, but what you say below really gets on my nerves. I’d have her in front of me, I’d say: ‘Who do you think you are?’ (…)

‘Jean’: A mobile? She told me that she wanted to get one.

Friend: Yes, she has one, but confidential, you know.

‘Jean’: Yeah, she’s really a little jerk. Here I’m losing my temper, but I’ll pretend to stay calm. I really want to get her, yeah I can be vicious … for her to be a bit more aware, and to knock some sense into her. -shite-, this kind of dish is served coldly.’

(…) No, we organise (the trip), she is only incidental. And it’s a good occasion, I’ve never been to England

Friend: Well, I don’t find the way you talk about her very nice, can I defend her? :) because I wouldn’t like it if someone thought the same thing about me. (…)

‘Jean’: (…) All I wish is to have teeth sharp enough to bite her, argh, i’d like to inject a poison into her, so that she will beg me after. Seriously, she’s far more moronic than I thought. The absolute trap would be: we plan to visit her together, and then you bail out.

Friend: No worries for me, but you can’t do that twice, she’s not stupid :)

‘Jean’: Yes she, she is very stupid. As naive as she is, she’ll never think that we’re talking about her, and that we plan things behind her back… In her mind, when people chat together it must mean they’re flirting, so (…) she doesn’t think straight, remember.

Another exchange, concerning his ex-gf (underage at the time):

‘Jean’: her 17, I 25

Friend: Here you go, and corruption of a minor to boot… :)

‘Jean’: well, she’s the one who asked for it, she insisted heavily, believe me, (…) But I really hadn’t asked for anything, but I learned everything from her. Etc.

Another more recent example concerns my daughter: she witnessed his behaviour at home, his extreme outbursts, his yelling and sometimes physical violence, for several years before I finally had the guts to tell him to leave. How do you think this has affected her?

She has occasional fits of anger where she screams and wants to break things.

Last year, he physically assaulted someone in front of the children.

See the relation?

He doesn’t. He’s blaming me for it, claiming that the separation is traumatizing the children and causing anger problems in my child.

This is the kind of logic I’m subjected to. Any rational discussion is virtually impossible with such people. Their ‘logic’ is so twisted that you end up banging your head against the wall. They’re masters at twisting your mind, making you believe it’s all your fault, acting all innocent and ‘I don’t understand what you mean, why are you refusing to talk to me?’ (while you tried to talk to them for ages when you were together, and they wouldn’t listen, which is precisely why you left them). The aim of their behaviour is to provoke you into anger, so that they can tell the world: ‘See? See how rational I am, and how crazy she sounds? Man, she’s really lost it with that crazy cult, hasn’t she?’

Clever ploy, isn’t it? Very much used among the manipulators and psychopaths, or ‘pervers narcissiques’, as psychologist Marie-France Hirigoyen calls them in her book Harcèlement moral.

After years of totally dismissing me and my feelings, and the children’s well-being, he now acts ‘concerned’ and wants to ‘talk’. Talk in his own terms, of course, which translates as: ‘I’m right, you’re wrong. You’re in a cult, I’m going to educate you so that you can finally admit that I’m right, you’ll get back to me, I’ll have you under my thumb again, and everything will be alright.’ Very much like what he wrote about me in that exchange with his friend above: ‘All I wish is to have teeth sharp enough to bite her, argh, i’d like to inject a poison into her, so that she will beg me after.’

The only way to deal with these manipulators is to NOT engage them. Otherwise you’ll end up drained, confused and upset.

Anyway, getting back to the story. I entered into a relationship with him, hoping somewhat to fix him and be fixed by him, and share the love which he seemed to want so badly to give me! Even though I had doubts and reservations, how could I not learn to love someone who pretended to love me so much?

Unsurprisingly, there were signs of dysfunctional and unhealthy dynamics from the start, but due to my previous disastrous relationships, I assumed these were the normal glitches of any relationship. Still affected by my former, quite negative relationships and my own weaknesses due to childhood trauma, I tried to fit an image that he wanted me to be, but failed every time (that’s what they do to you: no matter how hard you try, you are never good enough). This would trigger arguments between us, which would generally end up with him shouting verbal abuse. But then, we would make up, and I was ‘in love’, so I quickly learned to shove these episodes under the rug. I stayed in this unhappy relationship because of my own wounds that gave me a twisted idea of love, and because I didn’t know any better. I also thought that maybe starting a family (something he had mentioned at the beginning of our relationship) would somehow fix things and make it better, clean and heal the past wounds of both of us.

When I became pregnant, he was enthusiastic and happy, and so was I, though I was – of course – nervous.

Since I was working so hard to be what he wanted, to act the way he wanted, to do what he wanted me to do, much of the time it was alright and he was nice and he left me some breathing space, some semblance of freedom in order to ensure that I’d stay. As long as I didn’t get too close to someone else (friends), or that I wasn’t socializing too much, it was OK. But when I’d try to set boundaries, that’s where he’d start to show his control, managing to make me feel guilty for daring to question his controlling behaviour and showing signs of independence. After getting you through pity, they play the guilt trick. But the guilt is only good for you. He, on the other hand, didn’t see a problem with continuing to surf very dubious dating websites and trying to contact an old ‘feminine acquaintance’ while I was pregnant with our first child. When I found out, he explained to me that, well, I had been quite distant these past few weeks, and that it was normal for him to act that way. After all, it was my fault, right? I should have attended to his needs! A woman has to do that, it doesn’t matter if she’s pregnant and she’s the one in need of support, if she wants to keep a man.

But still, I had to continue to believe I loved him, and much of the time, things went well enough between us – with plenty of ‘emotions’ and thrill – so why be worried? Is any relationship perfect?

When our daughter was born, that’s when I began to change. I slowly began to realise some things about myself, about love, about my assumptions. This was the first time in my life I felt I was able to give complete and unconditional love to someone, in my own way, as myself, without fear of being rejected or judged. Through motherhood, I learned I didn’t need to fit someone else’s ideal, I could be myself with this child. I could give all the love I had inside me, unrestrained. This was like a breath of fresh air. It made me somehow start to reflect about my own childhood, my own past behaviour, and my current relationship.

But my joy in motherhood was spoiled by repeated instances of controlling and abusive behaviour from ‘Jean’. For example, when our child was a few days old, he once prevented me from nursing her, because she was screaming too much according to him, and thus he held her and told her to just stop, like he was trying to reason with an older child. I pleaded with him to just give her to me (I was in bed) so that she could feed – she was hungry – but he declared that he was the one who’d decide WHEN to give her to me. In the end, after torturing me with this drama for what seemed to be an interminable length of time, he gave me the poor crying, starving baby. I was both relieved as I held my child, and appalled at his behaviour. But I pushed it under the rug because ‘he could be so nice’ and seemed to love his child so much at other times. But the seed of awakening had been planted in that moment.

Such behaviour was really a red flag, but I didn’t want to see anything. Immersed in motherhood, bathed with ‘hormones’ (I was breastfeeding), I devoted myself completely to my daughter, and pushed his behavior under the rug. I don’t see how I could have done otherwise at the time, given the circumstances. And I still ‘loved’ him enough to excuse his behaviour, to take pity on him. After all, he too had suffered, and things were so tight, financially.

So I still wanted to hold on, to make nice, to fix things, despite his outbursts and his controlling, irrational behaviour. ‘Jean’ had an ability to switch from terrible anger where he’d swear at everyone and everything, to an apparently calm and nice attitude, as if nothing had happened at all. This baffled and concerned me, but again, I pushed it under the rug, because he could be ‘so nice and normal’ much of the time, as long as I (or anyone else) didn’t do anything to set him off.

Yes, I was upset that ‘Jean’ didn’t really want to listen to me when I wanted to talk about my feelings. He even rebuked me once when he wanted to have sex with me and I said I didn’t feel like it, because I was upset from remembering the issue with my father and how it still affected me sometimes. He tossed my feelings aside and rebuked me, saying that I shouldn’t be concerned about it, that it was no big deal at all, and basically that I was a wet blanket and annoying him with my issues.

This hurt me deeply, but I didn’t say anything. I just saw that a chasm was forming between us, growing wider and wider by the day. But I didn’t dare to admit it to myself: I desperately wanted to pretend everything was OK. I wanted to fulfill my own self-image of a woman who had succeeded in her emotional life, who hadn’t repeated the failures of her mother. I would even say to myself: OK, my grandma lost her husband because of cancer, my mother’s brother died of a brain tumor, making my aunt a widow, my mom got divorced, but I’m going be different, I’m not going to be alone like they were, I’m not going to end up like them, be it through death, abandonment or divorce.

So I stuck with it. And I soon became pregnant again, though we’d been rather distant sexually for some time. I discovered I was pregnant when I was already 2 months along – I had done a blood test before, suspecting I might be pregnant, but it had given a false negative. What was odd was that, despite the fact that he had talked more than once about how it would be nice to have another child, when he learned that I was again pregnant, he blamed me for getting pregnant and not taking the necessary measures to avoid that – whereas he KNEW I couldn’t take the pill due to medical concerns and though I was considering another means of contraception, I was still a bit reluctant about it (still for medical reasons/concerns). Of course, it’s always the woman’s job to take care of those things, right?

He reacted violently when I told him that I intended to keep this child. In one ugly fight, he even said he might just leave and let me deal with it on my own. I was very upset, but determined to have the baby (I just couldn’t picture myself getting an abortion at 2 months pregnant after having an echography and hearing this baby’s heart beating!). After the ‘crisis was over’, he calmed down and appeared to accept it. But the chasm had widened even more.

Though the pregnancy went well physiologically speaking, it was a rough ride psychologically. Towards the end of the term, I was becoming increasingly anxious. I had to have check-ups every two days at the hospital to make sure the baby was alright. ‘Jean’ harangued me constantly and blamed me for not delivering the baby in due time, for causing him trouble, and for basically being such a burden to him. It was not a good atmosphere to be looking forward to the birth of a child.

The labour finally started naturally, 12 days after the due date. I’m not going to go over the details here, but I just want to say that having this second child was the 2nd most beautiful day of my life (the 1st was the birth my first child). It made me realise that love can be pure, and that I didn’t need sex to get love or give love – that it could be natural and feel right, warm and caring, that I could be loved without the pressure of feeling sexually desirable.

I was all the more attached to this child because his father showed almost total indifference to him at his birth. It hurt me so much. I felt so bad for this little baby boy who I wanted so much to have a loving father, a stable home and family.

The baby’s arrival didn’t improve things at home, to say the least. After coming back from the maternity hospital following a 1-week stay (I had a C-section), he even yelled at me that it was all my fault, that THIS (referring to both me, my children, the financial situation we were in at the time, which was not great) was MY shit and I’d better take care of it. It sounded like the children and I were a total burden to him, were preventing him from ‘getting things done’ (whatever those things were). Years later, I’d learn from my mother that while I was at the hospital, after the birth, he said to her that it’d be best for everyone if he just left me and the children, that he just couldn’t deal with it, that we’d be better off without him. Looking back, I wish to god that he had done that. But it was probably another pity ploy.

I was at a complete loss, I couldn’t understand how he could appear so ‘normal’ and nice and then at the other times be so horrible and abusive. Often, after one of these outbursts (usually about nothing significant, no deep issue, since talking about how one feels is not part of what is significant for him), I would feel like I was in a madhouse. Once, after one such insane outburst in the middle of the night, I even said to myself that one day he might just lose it all completely and kill me and the children in our sleep. I actually began to live in a constant state of low-level fear running in the background of my life.

This was like living and walking constantly on sinking sands. You never know what’s going to happen next, when and if you’re going to be swallowed into this utter madness that manifested in this totally crazy behaviour.

I would keep count of his outbursts, feeling relief and hope when I experienced 1 month of consecutive days of relative calm – ‘wow! Just hold your breath and maybe it will last’, I would say to myself. And of course, I was exhausting myself trying to do whatever I could to stave off the outbursts.

Looking back, I’m amazed at how I was able to endure this for so long. The thing is I mostly felt stuck, with 2 young children, in a rural area, with family far away. I also think my previous experiences made me quite capable of enduring abuse, of accepting it, in a way – the way my granny accepted the abuse of her alcoholic brother (who lived in her house for nearly all his life because he never managed to get a life of his own) for years and years, till he sent her to the grave.

Getting back to my children, my love for them made me realize certain things. Now that I was a mother, I needed to grow out of childish behaviour and expectations, for the sake of my children. I needed to say goodbye to the need to find the father I had never had. This was never going to happen, because it is not how it works. It was this need which had made me seek bad and abusive men all along. These realisations were still fuzzy and confused in my mind, but slowly the ideal of a healthy relationship began to grow in me. I would look at my past and see all the errors, the weaknesses, the lies to the self and the false assumptions. I was also slowly realising how I was really alone in this relationship, how there were only superficial interactions. There were no deep bonds, no understanding, no empathy, no true intimacy, no respect; in short, no love.

Several months after our second child was born, while comforting myself and finding fulfillment in motherhood, I began to seek a way out of the social isolation we were subjected to due to his antisocial tendencies (which made some of our friends cut all contact with us because of his behaviour). I began to explore reading Internet forums and books. That’s how I came upon the Cassiopaea forum, among other forums and websites dealing with topics ranging from literature and cinema, to UFOs and psychology. I was curious about the topics discussed on Cassiopaea, as I’ve always been open-minded AND critical. I love intellectual challenge, and I was not disappointed! History, hard science, psychology, spirituality, the paranormal, … all these subjects discussed in a totally scientific way. It was refreshing. But I also joined the forum partly because I saw it as one of the only ways I could have normal human contact without him interfering and destroying it.

I didn’t expect to find what I found on this forum though: a network of intelligent, interesting, fun, honest and caring people from all over the world, who, like me, were interested in sharing information and data, exchange ideas, etc. The environment was really stimulating, the atmosphere was very convivial and fun, and most of all, it was family oriented: cleanness, decency, respect for others, honest love and caring were all emphasized; they didn’t even tolerate filthy language or anything that you wouldn’t want to expose your beloved children to! At the same time, it was not restrictive in any intellectual way; it was just that people were expected to meet standards of normal and decent human behavior that is so lacking in our world today. I felt such a relief at finally being able to have normal human interactions, in the midst of all this madness at home. Most of all, this participation on the forum opened new perspectives for me. I could delve into subjects and authors I’d never thought I’d be interested in, especially in the psychology, politics and history fields.

As part of this, I started to read again psychology books, especially books about childhood trauma, and it really drove the point home regarding my own childhood’s wounds. As I began to take a deeper look at these traumas thanks to these books and the discussions with group and forum members who also discussed and shared about their own traumas, all in a safe environment, I wanted to share my enthusiasm with my partner – I thought reading those books could help him in dealing with his own stuff too. But he didn’t seem interested so I didn’t push it.

When he was in his ‘normal mood’, we would talk about politics, and we seemed to have the same views – though he appeared more radical than me, (and more radical than the forum members), because he admired and advocated violent modes of dissent and anarchy. This somewhat worried me, though it perfectly fit with his tendency to have violent outbursts and to blame everyone (external ‘enemies’).

The fact that I made friends within this forum and shared things with them about topics he was not interested in – because when I tried to bring it up, he would ignore it like he was annoyed – made me realise how wide the gap between us was getting; too wide to be bridged. How I desperately needed something deeper in a relationship.

On top of that, he blamed me for being a stay-at-home mom taking care of the children while he was ‘supporting’ the family – which he actually mostly didn’t do: not only did I help him with his business (contacting customers, giving Internet lessons, doing translations for his websites, etc), he also profited a lot from my mother’s generous financial help and sometimes his parents’ help, though he never had a word of gratitude for the latter and couldn’t stand them, calling them jerks. This has changed now, by the way, since he had to depend on them when I broke up with him, so he’s now the most loving son ever. This ability to wear and change his mask whenever needed never ceases to amaze me.

Anyway, on the discussion forum I made many friends. I wanted to give back help because I had received so much for free. I proposed to help with translation projects; I have a passion for translation, and thought it would be great to make more material available to French readers, and to gain experience in order to get a job – something he obviously dreaded, as he hated the idea of me gaining any independence whatsoever, never mind that he abused me constantly about not having a job! (By the way, when, a couple of years later, I told him about my wish to break up with him and said that I wanted to manage my life on my own, he told me: ‘You won’t last 3 days.’) I began to feel a little more confidence, and after some time, I began to discuss my relationship problems with a few members who had been through similar experiences. I told them about his abusive behavior that I was unable to either change or tolerate no matter what I did. I described his frequent outbursts of anger at home, and also in front of his family. I also discussed the fact that he behaved in irrational ways that were scary. I described how he could appear completely normal most of the time. Only sometimes he felt ‘provoked’ and acted irrationally, with a violence that was out of proportion to what, according to him, had ‘provoked’ him. This irrational, unpredictable behaviour is what was worrying me the most.

I had finally found true friends in the only way I could, being so isolated from friends and family by ‘Jean’. And I would suggest that if you are alone and suffering under the dominance and control of this type of individual, you should also find friends, people who can think, who can share experiences, and who can support you. The pathologicals hate that!

As I said, I described all of these things to a few women members of the forum that I trusted, some of whom are trained psychological experts. These friends encouraged me to try to work it out with many helpful suggestions, which I did for a couple of years with their support. The truth is, the relationship actually lasted 2 years longer than it would have if these people had not been there to support me and try to help me make things work between ‘Jean’ and me.

Finally, when I determined that – for the 11 years I’d known him – nothing I did was going to change anything and the relationship had deteriorated beyond repair, I decided that I was, after all, a worthwhile human being and did not deserve to be living in a loveless, abusive relationship. I realised finally (it’s never too late, I suppose) that I had had enough of this madness and sick behaviour, and that leaving him was the only way to be healthy myself for the sake of the children. I made the decision that this relationship must end. Notice that I made the decision. Absolutely nobody made it for me, like he so visciously claims. I am far too stubborn to let someone tell me what to do when it comes to my children. Even if they had tried – which couldn’t be further from the truth – I would still have always had the last decision. But he cannot accept this, because it means that he would have to take responsibility for his failure in our relationship, something he has shown himself incapable of.

One of the breaking points for taking the decision to leave was that he made a sexual remark in front of the children. He commented that my son loved to have his behind wiped by his mom, saying that the 3-year-old child actually enjoyed it sexually! This really made me sick to my stomach. It brought up all the things about his past that he confessed to me and that I thought were over now, and I became really scared that one day he’d go as far as abusing the children sexually. When I say abuse, don’t get me wrong: sexual abuse is not just forcing intercourse on a child. It can be unhealthy behaviour in front of them which creates a sick atmosphere. Knowing how he was with me, sexually, how he had been with other women and men and children in his past, and now, hearing him make this totally sick remark, just set off warning bells inside me. I knew, without any doubt – call it a mother’s intuition – that I needed to get my children out of this sick dynamic.

I want to ask the reader: do you think this kind of comment is healthy and normal? If you do, I suggest you read Caricature of Love by psychiatrist Hervey Cleckley. You’d be surprised at the extent to which normal sexuality has been perverted over the centuries, and how many really abnormal and perverted behaviours appear normal in today’s society.

As a side note, this visible deterioration in our relationship didn’t seem to affect him the way it affected me. It’s like the more I wanted to pull away, the more he was determined that I would not. He affected a super-normal attitude and made it clear that he wanted to stick with me no matter what, despite his sexual frustration (years of abuse had made me grow sexually distant) and his veiled sarcasm about women (like women who frowned at the idea of meeting the sexual urges of their husbands and of having a lot of children were just douche bags, possibly crazy feminist extremists), he became more determined than ever to keep me under his control.

I talked about my decision to leave him to some of the women members of the forum, and – having shared with them the additional details that I was concerned about ‘Jean’ sexually abusing the children, though I still had not shared my full knowledge of his perversities with them – they supported me in this, and offered advice about how to do it safely considering the potential violence that I had described him to be capable of.

But once I made the decision, I didn’t know how to break it to him. For years, I had felt stuck in this relationship. I didn’t know how to proceed. I was worried about his reaction. I suspected ‘Jean’ would NOT let me go that easily. When he wanted to leave me when he learned I was pregnant, it was fine: it was HIS decision. But now, it was MY decision, and I suspected that if the separation idea came from me, it was out of the question for ‘Jean’.

I brought my concerns up to him several times in the course of the months preceding the separation, but he didn’t want to hear about it. He gave me no option: he told me that if I left, I would have to leave alone, abandon the children. Full stop. He even commented once that he would really be annoyed if he had to leave the house to find a job in another town, because he’d then have to go to see prostitutes, and that would be inconvenient! I suppose that’s how he sees women, objects who are there to fulfill his needs (not only sexual, but also material, financial, etc., as I was doing. He was never able to support us or to keep a job or make a business work.)

I pondered for literally months over it, and finally took a firm decision: instead of trying diplomacy, as I had tried in vain for several months, I just plainly told him to leave the house or I would take an appointment with a social worker and force him to leave. Perhaps the possibility of being humiliated is what persuaded him since he did agree to leave the house. I suppose he didn’t expect me to act so radically, to be so firm, and that might have destabilized him for a moment.

Thing is, I took it all too lightly. I thought “he’s left, so it means he’s accepted the separation and it’ll just be a matter of working things out together in the interest of the children.” Despite having read books about pathological relationships, I didn’t want to see that it precisely applied to him, I didn’t want to see the truth about him. I was thinking I could get away from him that easily, that we could behave in a civilized way if only for the sake of the children. Pity and guilt, once again, had the best of me. I was feeling bad for telling him to leave, and wanted to make it easy on him. I’d soon learn that he had already planned his ‘revenge’.

To my face, he pretended to accept the decision, but behind my back (something I was to learn later), he planned to emotionally blackmail me, to try to force me into going back to him by threatening and defaming Laura and the forum (with whom, though not being interested in some of the topics discussed on the forum, he NEVER had a problem before), calling them a cult and claiming that the only reason I wanted to leave him was because I was brainwashed by them!

Taking advantage of my willingness to make nice and my blindness regarding his pathology at the time, ‘Jean’ came to my house one weekend, after moving out, and stole all the data from my hard drive with all my private correspondence, including emails between Laura, other friends and me, where I asked advice about how to leave him. He then went to see the nanny who sometimes looked after the children, and ‘announced’ to her that I had joined a cult (I’d learn all of this later). He also called my mother and literally overwhelmed her with emails he had stolen and taken totally out of context, documents he had written defaming Laura and the Cass forum, the SOTT website, the meditation programme – pages and pages of lies and distortions.

But it was not enough. After he had stunned my mother with his ‘revelations’, he then proceeded to tell her that I had been abused by my father when I was a child (something I had confessed to him a long time ago, but that I never told my mother because I never wanted to make a fuss out of it. Besides, how do you announce that to your mom? It’s shameful enough as it is). However, the icing on the cake was that he said to my mother that this abuse might not be true, that it might have been a false memory planted in my mind by the ‘cult’ through hypnosis! Never mind the fact that I’d told him about it before I even became involved in the group and that I have emails – dated from 2001 – to prove it.

We see here that he was using the same tactics he had applied when we were together: trying to isolate me from others so that I’d have nowhere and nobody to turn to, so that he could better corner me and make me go back to him, or if he couldn’t, just basically take revenge by destroying everything and everyone around me.

Fortunately, my mother, who knew him well enough, for having been subjected to his verbal abuse many times and for having been taken advantage of financially by him (she helped him more than once when his ‘personal business’ was going down), didn’t believe him for a minute. She called me to tell me everything – that’s how I learned about what he had done, the HD theft, the cult accusations, everything.

Having failed at manipulating my mother, he then proceeded to tell his whole family that I was in a cult, so that I never got a chance to talk to them and explain what was really going on and that I had no intention of having bad relations with them just because I was not going to stay together with their son. They believed him.

As a parenthesis, he also told my mother NOT to tell me that they both ‘knew’ about the ‘cult’, because if I learned that they knew, I might resort to extreme behaviour, like I was going to escape with the children or something. I find that rather ironic, on the part of someone who has quite a heavy record in terms of ‘extreme behaviour’. Can we say projection? I think he actually projects what HE is inside and his own insane behaviour onto others. I think he uses the cult accusations partly as a way of diverting attention from himself, thinking that by having everyone around me focus on me being in a ‘cult’ (which is the most outrageous lie anyone ever told about me), no one will notice how crazy and insane he is, no one will ask him about his failures as a partner and a father.

Thing is, someone did notice: the family counselor I met with him after I broke up commented to me once that he suspected my ex of having some sort of pathology, which, according to him, didn’t bode well for the future. Unfortunately, this man was prohibited from testifying in court, because the decision to see him was mine, and wasn’t ordered by the judge. So he couldn’t be party to the custody matter.

Anyway, I clung to the hope (wishful thinking) that despite his past behaviour of abuse and controlling issues, his accusations were just due to anger for being dumped – blaming others (family, friends) when you’re dumped is not uncommon – and that soon, the anger would fade away, he would stop his lies about me, about my friends, about Laura and the forum, and we could reach some semblance of cordial relations – for the sake of the children.

But it didn’t fade away.

Last summer, I went to pick up the children, who had spent the holidays with him and his parents (and also his sister and brother-in-law, who are over 50, unemployed, and live with his parents). A friend of mine accompanied me. While there, ‘Jean’s’ mother tried to physically restrain me in a closed room so that she and my ex could both force me to listen to their BS, treating me like a child who needed to be ‘reset’ on the right path. (How’s that for ‘cultish’ behaviour?) My friend heard me call out and came into the room to help me, and he attacked her physically – tackled her like a football player. She required medical attention, and filed a complaint against him… which didn’t lead anywhere because lo and behold, it was totally dismissed because of the cult accusations!

Keep in mind this is the same man who’s accusing me of potentially resorting to ‘extreme behaviour’! Blaming the victim, anyone?

This incident resulted in a court hearing and a summary judgement where he presented his lies and defamatory documents about Laura and her family to the court (among this false evidence were the e-mails he had stolen from my hard drive, badly translated and taken out of context, as well as a ‘synthesis’ of his own distorted interpretation of the work done by Laura and her team. His lies were so blatantly ridiculous and easily deniable by FACTS, that I was surprised to hear that the authorities even cared to read them). He had his lawyer send the documents to my lawyer on a Friday night, two days before the hearing, so that I wouldn’t know about them or have the opportunity to prepare a proper defence with my lawyer.

Following the hearing, a psychological assessment was ordered for him, me and the children. The report of this assessment states that ‘Jean’s’ conclusions about me being in a ‘cult’ are rigid and inaccurate, and that he has a very obsessive personality that can’t stand rejection, and that leads him to research compulsively about cults in order to reassure himself, and conjure up his fears and his feelings of rejection caused by the separation.

The assessment underlines the fact that I put great efforts into freeing myself from his “control”. That despite my “vulnerability” and the fact that I’m not “self-assured”, Jean is making a wrong assessment of my interests. Here, I’d like to make a few comments:

Sure, one can say that I used to be vulnerable, as far as MEN were concerned (how rare for a woman!) – and I explained above where it came from. However, I’d like to point out that when one has suffered abuse for years, and is undergoing a psychological assessment following defamatory claims by a deviant who’s been harassing, spying on and threatening one for months, one indeed feels “vulnerable”. All the more so that the law believes the manipulator and ignores you, refusing you the victim status. In such cases, how could one NOT feel “fragilized” and have one’s self-assurance completely destoyed? Having doubts about oneself – in the sense of: questioning oneself in order to know oneself, so as to grow – seems to me to be a human, healthy quality, contrary to the psychopath who NEVER questions himself. But in a world taken over by pathology, the psychopath’s values are praised as the norm to adopt. It also seems to me that the psychological expert was influenced and manipulated by Jean: the report states that during his own assessment, Jean remained focused on me – a trick to divert attention from his own “psychological issues” and his abnormal behaviour.

For me, this is worrying enough. Obsession is precisely one of his modes – obsessions with sex, with some ideal of women that exists only in his twisted mind, obsession with ‘getting things done’, with ‘not having the time to get things done’ and so on. That sounds crazy enough for me. Obsession can lead to abnormal, pathological behaviour. He sure is obsessive in his harassment of anybody who has ever been a friend to me or has supported me. He can’t stand me having friends – friends that I chose on my own, not friends whom he chooses for me and who get his seal of approval by virtue of the fact that he controls them.

It was astonishing that he tried to get back with me after the hearing – wanting to arrange a meeting with me, alone of course, so we could ‘talk’ (translation: so that he could mind-manipulate me into going back to him), but it didn’t work, so he upped the ante. He began to stalk me on the Cass forum. Then he joined the godlikeproductions forum and started to post his lies and defamation there.

I learned from his posts on GLP that he even created a defamation website of his own, copy-pasting all the lies being spewed in the GLP nonsense thread.

This not only proves his obsession and insanity, but also his fanaticism. I mean, doesn’t he have anything else better to do with his life? (Like going to work so he can pay support for his children?) Is he so pathological that he’s willing to spend all his days defaming people who have done nothing wrong to him at all except being my friends and giving me support when I told them about the abuse I was subjected to by him? Is he so full of hatred and vindictive rage that he’s willing to destroy other people, including his own children, whom he obviously doesn’t care about since he’s just using them to get what he wants (my destruction and the destruction of everybody even remotely close to me)?

What kind of man would join forces with another, similar man who has been relentlessly defaming Laura for years, put her family in danger, is into black magic, was once admitted to a mental hospital, and who is friends with the cult guru Eric Pepin, once sued for pedophilia?

It’s not enough that, before I left him, he didn’t care one bit about the children and considered them as a ‘burden’ that he’d be too happy to leave behind, that he yelled at them, and put their life in danger on several occasions? Now this man’s new buddies are Satanists and sexual deviants. Would you hand over your own children to this kind of person with a ‘light heart’? Knowing you don’t have the choice, because the law couldn’t take a measure of his insanity?

It’s a very distressing situation, and I wouldn’t wish it on anyone.

This is the pathology that Laura, her family and now myself, are faced with, must deal with – these individuals stab you in the back, always act in the dark, are sly and devious, and very good manipulators; they can trick people into believing that THEY are the victims.

What is so ironic and crazy-making is this is a man who’s now talking about morals and who’s calling my friends ‘abnormal, frauds, financial profiteers, stealers of souls, manipulators, controlling freaks and cyberstalkers.’ Blaming the victim again? Projecting what is actually inside him?

He claims I’ve been ‘controlled’ so as to make me leave him. This is clearly false, as anyone who knows the facts (and not just the rumours and lies spread by him about me) can see: the fact is that I asked for advice about my decision to leave him, and when my friends advised me to be very cautious and take any measure to protect myself and the children, I didn’t listen to any of this advice, I didn’t take it seriously. But the consequence of my ignoring that advice was the mess I found myself in. He behaved exactly in the way that they had warned me he would! The sad and ironic thing – destroying any claim that I was ‘influenced’ – is that had I applied the advice, offered from women who spoke from their own experience with similar situations, it might – just might – not have led to such a mess.

Only after he stole my hard-drive, quoted emails poorly translated and taken out of context in court, twisted every fact regarding myself, the children and Mrs. Jadczyk, did I realize how they were right to warn me about the danger I was about to throw myself in if I didn’t take these concerns seriously. Only after he had made me suffer lies, stress, defamation and threats did I realize how utterly twisted he is, which led me to revisit all my past with him, all he told me, his confession, etc., and clearly see that, yeah, that’s what he is, he’s always been that way.

Only it took this separation to realize it.

More recently, there has been a judgement regarding the custody of the children, and I find it very weird and shocking that this judgement not only reproduces the very emails he had stolen, badly translated and without context, and which had been produced during the temporary hearing for the temporary judgement. These emails were pointed out as STOLEN and FORGED, and yet the judge reproduced them as evidence? Whereas all my claims – which are documented by facts – along with the psychologist’s report stating plainly that he has an OBSESSIVE personality and is making a WRONG interpretation of my interests, based on his own INSECURITY and ‘fears’ – which compel him to find ‘information about cults in order to comfort himself’ – are missing? False claims produced by a man who can’t stand being dumped and lashes out in a vindictive manner are taken as evidence, whereas an expert assessment was totally dismissed?

Something’s amiss here. I thought we were in the 21st century, where women were (more or less) equals with men. All I see is that the system has been treating me like a child, or a mindless, stupid woman, who’s been taken over by a ‘cult’. They believe him, and they don’t hear me. This is just an example of how many women are still treated these days – and I’m not a ‘feminist’. I’m just a human being, who happens to be a woman, and I want to be heard and taken seriously. It seems the law – police and all – is believing his lies so easily without checking anything that you’re bound to think that something is up here. Or is it just old patriarchal values showing up?

A decent man – a real man – would have behaved decently, even if hurt by the separation. He would have said in court that he loves his children and wants to be a good father, and wants to talk and dialogue together to make the best life possible for them.

A decent man – a real man – doesn’t go around spreading lies, manipulating and using his children’s safety as a pretext to get his revenge. What kind of man does this? Not a man who loves his children. Proof is he hasn’t given one penny to help, to buy them anything. He has taken them on holidays for a weekend to show how much of a good father he is. But hold on, that was before the judgement. Now that the judgement is settled, he doesn’t even have 1 euro to buy them a pen. Classic, isn’t it?

Clearly and plainly: I want him to leave me alone. I never want to see him again, I never want to hear his voice, I want to try to erase from my mind and body everything that reminds me of him. You can’t understand unless you leave how draining and upsetting it is to have someone constantly spying on you, about you, about your friends and your activities, still trying to manipulate you into going back to him after you’ve told him plainly that you WANT to be left alone, that you have no feeling for him anymore and you don’t want him. I don’t want him to send me crazy emails with ‘links to cults’ so he can ‘educate’ me. I want him to leave me alone. I’ve been screaming in the desert for too long, and I’m utterly fed up with it. I can’t go along with my life because he is there in the background. I want him to stop! I want him to disappear from my life!

I’ve no hope to be heard by him, given the type I’m dealing with, but it feels liberating to say it publicly.

This guy who’s been saying all along that I’ve been taken over by a cult, well, you know, this is the same guy who once practiced magic in order to get me… how is it called? Oh yeah, ‘love spell’, where you get to write the name of the object of your ‘attention’, and pronounce some ‘magic formula’, and there you go. That very man who accuses innocent people of being gurus, fits exactly the profile of a fake guru himself! He is doing all this because he has lost his best ‘follower’, me.

I just hope that, in some small way, the words I have written here will partly explain how this horrible situation came to pass and will stand as a warning to other women who, like me, think that they can save men like this: you can’t. There is no real man inside to save; there’s nothing inside such a man but a twisted, rabid animal who, as Sandra Brown put it, devastates everyone in his path, including the women and children who love him.

‘We can’t prevent what we don’t identify, we can’t treat what we don’t diagnose. And we can’t teach how to spot them unless we understand pathology ourselves.’

One thing is sure, the best way to protect anyone – partners, friends, family, children, associates – from such a pathological deviant is to expose him for everyone to see. To reveal the utter sickness behind the mask of sanity. That’s one of the objectives of this testimonial, which will be updated as new data comes up, and backed up with all the documents and proof available.

Share

Testimonial of Gonzo – Cassiopaean Forum Member

I am a father, a husband, a federal civil servant and a member of the Cassiopaea forum since October, 2008, although I had been reading the forum and several of Laura Knight Jadczyk’s books for a few years before I officially joined the forum.

I was attracted to the Laura’s work because she was the first person I’ve come across who tried to apply some form of scientific rigor in her attempts to study the unknown side of reality.  I have found her approach to be sincere and honest.  If her critics have actually read her work, I am surprised that they could still hold contempt for her.  I would have assumed they would have noticed the same thing most of us have noticed: that sharing her work to those interested in reading it, is borne from a selfless and honest desire to share her discoveries in the hopes of helping mankind through difficult times.  She is the farthest thing from a self promoter or a guru and yet, like anyone wanting to share their work to a broader audience, has to deal with the uncomfortable reality that one’s work needs to be promoted. And so, if I have ever seen any promoting, it has been the work and not the person, although the two are inseparably linked.

I was attracted to the forum because I saw a group of individuals interested in helping each other become better people as they search for objective truths about our reality, no matter how painful those truths may be.  Through the years I have witnessed many people come and a few leave.  Those who stayed were able to learn to see themselves through the eyes of others and start to heal the wounds that life, especially early life, may inflict.  It is difficult to recognize one’s defensiveness or passive-aggressiveness or the myriad other ways our wounds manifest in how we deal with others and for some, it is unbearable. Those who left, seemed unable to deal with the pain of realizing how others saw them and could not allow themselves to accept the truth, preferring the comfort of self illusion.  Some of them returned later, able to accept the mirror after careful contemplation while others were never heard from again.  And yet a few others were so enraged with what they saw in the mirror that they chose to lash out at the mirror, and continue to do so to this day.

Throughout my few years of participation, I have recognized several things about myself that I am working on.  For example, I have an intense need to be liked and wanted.  This has created all sorts of problems in my life, including coming across as a know-it-all, being overly helpful to others at significant expense to myself and my family, changing my personality to accommodate others, etc.  This is mostly based in a family dynamic of my early childhood and I am making some headway, thanks to the mirroring and suggestions received on the forum, as well as reading several psychology books recommended by forum members.  I also have several other issues too personal to note here, for which I have also received some great insight from the forum.

It is also interesting that, since we cannot separate mental health from physical health, a lot of the research on the forum is dedicated to diet.  This researched has had significant impact on me reducing the amount of nerve pain I experience from a spinal disease and has all but stopped my fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis.  This is no minor thing, since specialists have been able to do little other than exacerbate the problem or feed me ever-increasing amounts of pain medication over the last fifteen years.

As a result, my mental, physical and spiritual health has improved immensely, with direct benefits to my family and wife, who rarely see the frustration, anger, arrogance, exhaustion, pain and selfishness that was once my daily reality.

Gonzo
Ottawa, Canada

Share

Testimonial: the Reverend Grant Sutherland

I’m writing this testimonial under a pseudonym, and with a couple of place-names changed to protect my real identity. There are various reasons for this. For one, there is nothing to be gained from revealing my real name when there are so many defamers around who would wish to harass anyone in public life who was prepared to stand up for Laura Knight-Jadczyk and her work. If it’s needed, I can always testify under my real name in a document prepared and attested by the proper legal authorities. But for the moment I want to preserve a measure of anonymity. That in itself, however, doesn’t detract from what I have to say. It’s just a responsible recognition of the sort of world we live in.

I’m a priest in the Church of England. As a religious professional it’s my job and my responsibility to investigate spiritual matters, for the benefit of society at large. For many in our secularized society, this must seem a strange vocation – but it’s valued in many quarters, and has a long-standing tradition behind it. A common belief about priesthood is that it’s seen as inherently conservative, and there’s a lot of truth here – although it works two ways. One way might be termed the way of the literalist, the priest seeking simply to keep the tradition he or she has received. The other way might be termed the way of the seeker. And here the priest, while keeping the tradition, is nevertheless exploring the deeper implications of it.

Ideally, any priest who is useful to his or her society has probably started off from a literalist stance, and is later exploring what it actually means. And the same might be true of any Christian. Speaking from my own tradition, the Church of England, there is nothing peculiar in this way of thinking. It’s exemplified by the common-sense exploratory work of the English medieval mystics such as Julian of Norwich and the unknown author of The Cloud of Unknowing, and by the later Anglican divines, who had little time for hogwash, lies, or easy sentiment. Their understanding was that Christianity was a robust faith, which didn’t need protecting. It could stand on its own two feet without apologetics. And this is my point of view too, because it allows for the sort of open-mindedness and open-heartedness where the Holy Spirit can be free to move as it wishes, and show forth the mysterious ways of God.

I started off in the faith as a teenager who found much of value in the Bible – particularly in the words of Jesus. Having attended Anglican and Methodist churches, I then went to university to study ancient languages, primarily those from ancient western Asia, which meant a familiarity with the Old Testament. I also worked as a student archaeologist for some months in the region. Having wanted to devote my life to God, I entered a monastery in Suffolk after graduation, and after the appropriate training there, helped to set up a new monastery in Uzbekistan. After this, I was trained for a further three years in pastoral theology before ordination as a priest.

In my parish work it became abundantly clear that simple adherence to a literalist understanding of Christianity was not enough for those who came to church. The inner pain many Christians experience might be alleviated by their faith, but they clearly needed more. And so I set out to explore further the depths of this faith. And in 2004 I came across Laura’s work on the internet. I’d been looking for further information on psychopathy, and I found a wealth of material on this subject on the Cassiopaea website – together with some very profound spiritual insights about the Christian faith.

Laura and I sent various emails to each other on Biblical topics, and she was able to bring some of my reading on the Bible up to date, which was an enormous help. Laura herself is a brilliant student of the Bible, and has some profound insights, which have helped me enormously in my work to understand how it was put together. At universities around the world there is a great deal of ongoing work on this subject, which sadly doesn’t always filter down to most Christians – which is a great shame, as the ramifications of this work are potentially of great significance for us all. Laura’s work on the Bible, the depth of her theological erudition, and her writings on the subject – all founded on her own clearly evident devotion to the divine – have been of immense significance for me in understanding more of the ways of the Holy Spirit. For that I cannot thank her enough.

We met for the first time in January 2010, when she invited me to her house, and I’ve since spent something like three months in total as her guest working on Biblical material. As a person she’s down-to-earth and approachable, with an enormous fund of practical common-sense. She is generous with her encouragement, and has a truly nurturing spirit. I’ve also attended a couple of her experimental sessions in superluminal communication using a spirit board, and I can assure anybody that these are well-controlled affairs carried out with respect and courtesy for the unknown, but in a chatty and lively environment. These sessions were neither seances with the dead, nor were they in any sense a “dabbling” with the occult: they were serious scientific experiments, with no sense of the dramatic or untoward.

A lot of people have shown some trepidation about spirit boards, and perhaps this is all for the best. The spiritual world, about which we have little scientific understanding as yet, is something of a jungle, as many priests can bear witness. Laura herself has conducted what the Church would term “exorcisms” as an extension of her work and training as a certified hypnotherapist, and it takes a good deal of maturity, not to mention courage, to pit oneself against what we might euphemistically term an Evil Spirit. This isn’t to say that the Church itself completely understands such things – and is usually frank in saying so, at least in private – but the reality of the intensity of spiritual evil in certain afflicted individuals is something that society expects the Church to be able to deal with. It’s worthy of special note that Laura has conducted herself with particular competence and psychological insight on such occasions. I know this to be true because I’ve listened very closely to the tape-recordings from one of these exorcisms.

Two things stand out for me here: she never faltered, even under the psychological onslaught of a directed evil that would have knocked the wind out of most of us, and she didn’t fall prey to the temptation to set herself up as master of the evil spirit. That takes an extraordinary wisdom and humility, in the face of something palpably evil and actually very much an unknown quantity.

 

That kind of background stands Laura well in dealing with the spiritual world, where there are certainly dangers, but also potentially much of benefit for humanity as a whole. Although, as with any information gained from a spiritual source, constant checking is required to verify it – and for that reason as much as anything, much of the work done by Laura is dedicated research at a high academic level. She’s certainly the most well-read person I have ever met, as well as a brilliant writer on spiritual matters – itself not an easy task, where a great deal of modern writing on the subject can be rather light-weight or prone to mystification. Laura, though, is neither of these things. She is clear, direct and deep.

This might all seem somewhat abstruse – but Laura’s work has real-world implications. Our world is beset by evil on many fronts. Some of this is just plain old ignorance, while other forms are quite direct in intent. The work on psychology that Laura continues to forge ahead with has focused on the damage done in narcissistic family and relationship settings, and this has clear pastoral implications as her online forum bears evidence. She has also investigated the barriers to an individual’s own progress to become more mature and responsible. Such tools for deeper self-knowledge are invaluable – and the work continues to find out more. A notable success here was the recent development of Eiriu Eolas, a set of breathing techniques which relaxes the mind and body profoundly, and releases deeply-seated emotional blocks.

Laura and her associates have also focused particularly on the damage done by psychopaths – people without a functioning conscience. The havoc and turmoil they cause has had an abiding impact on each of us as individuals. My own studies have revealed that psychopaths have been the primary cause of the ongoing deterioration of society as a whole, which has been skewed out of shape and degraded by them. In business and politics, not to mention the sciences, there has been much damage done. It’s now clear that much of the misery of war and economic exploitation has largely been caused by such people.

 

Laura was instrumental in publishing a particularly important book, Political Ponerology, by the Polish psychologist Andrew Lobaczewski, which explores the mechanisms whereby society is broken down by psychopaths in positions of political power. And indeed there are many such people in positions of national leadership, which should be cause of grave concern everywhere. Psychopaths, as well as their enablers, the authoritarians – a large bloc of people who simply go along as they’re directed by whoever they perceive to be an authority figure – continue to be instrumental in causing untold suffering. Indeed, religious life itself has been deeply corrupted by such people.

In shining a light on such things, Laura and her allies have understandably come under attack. Such people as those who attack her thrive in the darkness. Detractors have attempted to portray Laura’s group as a cult, hoping that if they sling enough mud, some of it will stick long enough to raise people’s suspicions. This is why I have written this testimonial. I am a witness to the truth and that truth is that Laura is an investigator. That’s what pushes her forward – the search for truth, insofar as we can know it. That necessarily makes it a search which is scientific but also spiritual. This might seem unusual in a world where research tends to be somewhat fragmented, but it’s by no means unheard of. It is, after all, fully in line with the “seeker” mode of mature Christianity, and a holistic approach to the sciences. Her team of fellow-investigators, including her husband – a well-respected academic physicist – follows this approach too, and there is a strong sense of fellowship among the members of what is essentially a research association.

For all these reasons, I heartily commend Laura and her Cassiopaea project as a brave and honest endeavour to understand more about ourselves and our situation, in our material as well as spiritual context.

10 April 2011

Share

Betsy’s Truthtimonial

My name’s Betsy Ashby and I’ve been an active Guardian in the Pagan Community for 30+ years. I’m the Director of Out of the Dark and we’ve worked over 100 different events, marches and gatherings…so many I’ve lost count. We’ve maintained a list of predators, psychopaths and assorted problematic Pagans since the mid 80′s when one of my Teachers entrusted me with a copy of her list of “dangerous people” in the Pagan Community going back to the 50′s. Of course most of them aren’t still on the list, ’cause they’re dead and there’s no point in keeping an eye out for the ones that are already worm food… but I still have that first little file box full of index cards we used long before computers were generally available.

A little over a year ago, I found the Cassiopaea forum while I was searching for info about a ChickenHawk by the name of Eric Pepin. Google spit out a lawsuit where Pepin sued  Laura Knight-Jadczyk, SOTT.net, and the Cass group for libel and LOST, which gave me a big giggle… so I kept digging. I’d never heard of Laura Knight-Jadczyk, Arkadiusz Jadczyk ,or the Cassiopaeans, before, but the fact that they were standing up to Pepin and several other predators I was already familiar with got my attention; so I joined their forum and introduced myself.

I basically said “Hi, my name’s Betsy Ashby and I see you’ve assembled quite a list predatory azzhats. I’m an avid collector of lists of predatory azzhats … do you mind if I rip your site and filter through the thousands of pages looking for useful nuggets of info?” They said “Sure, go ahead, help yourself” so I did.

In the process of reading through the Cassiopaean pages, I was immediately struck by the enormity of the pile of steaming bovine fecal matter these folks have had to wade through just to chat about life, the universe and everything, as they see it. Now I know that every Internet forum gets its fair share of trolls, but the sheer number of troglodytes who join the Cass forum for the sole purpose of disrupting the group is unbelievable!

Of course the very first thing I did when I read all the accusations against Laura and Ark was to check out the various claims being made by their detractors. As I said, I had no idea who these people were, and I’m not exactly a trusting person to begin with. Someone I’ve known for 20 years can tell me it’s raining, and I still want to peep out the window to be sure…. it’s just my nature. I was also well aware of the fact that I could have stumbled into a pack of “azzclowns fighting among themselves” type situation… I’ve seen that before too. It took me about a week to ascertain that was NOT the case here.

I went through EVERY (what I now know to be) libelous claim against Laura Knight-Jadczyk, Arkadiusz Jadczyk and the Cassiopaean group, one by one, looking for proof of these horrible charges against them… and I did not find one single shred of evidence of wrongdoing. Zip, zilch, NADA! What I did find was that Laura and her group have spent a good deal of time examining and publicly exposing the actions of a wide variety of psycho hose beasts… child molesters, rapists, thieves, plagiarists, etc. This certainly does explain where the rabid, obsessed, anti-fan club comes from!

Like most cyberstalkers, Laura’s attackers take a tiny grain of truth then twist it around a few times and wrap it up in multiple LIES. If you want to get to the truth of these stories, you’ve got to peel them apart, layer by layer, just like a cabbage, until you get to the heart of the matter.

The worse charge leveled against Laura is that she was arrested for “attempted murder” or some variation of same…. so I looked into this claim first. The TRUTH of this story is a matter of public record for all to see Members of the Bar just can’t lie about stuff like this, and this dude giving the statement about her innocence was her Public Defender, so I think he knows what really happened.

Over 40 years ago, when Laura was a teenager, she was assaulted by a large male perv. She defended herself with a kitchen implement she grabbed off a counter top, and was found innocent of any crime by reason of SELF DEFENSE… despite  the fact that her assailant was politically well connected in Florida.

Essentially, she was viciously attacked by a large, male predator and went all Thor’s daughter on his ass with a meat mallet. GOOD FOR HER!!!! One in four women are physically assaulted before the age of 21, and it’s real nice to see a sister able to defend herself now and again. I think it’s also VERY important to note here that she could have killed her attacker… and she didn’t. She maintained enough self control to stop whooping him once he went down, and run… she got away without taking a life, and I think I admire that most of all.

This horrible, traumatic incident in Laura’s distant past tells me a lot about Laura … and even more about the bottom feeders who try to twist the story and use it against her. They want people to condemn her for saving her own life without taking the life of her attacker… whereas I think she should put it on her resume.

The second allegation of criminal activity I examined was the so called “Raffle Scam”
Laura and her group had a house raffle that turned out to be a giant honking mess. Everybody including the next door neighbor’s dog got lawyers, big legal fight… apparently over taxes, and by the time all was said and done, the only real winners were the attorneys.

Laura admits right on her own website that she screwed up. She was moving to another country, didn’t pay attention to what the lawyers were doing, etc. read it yourself. Bottom line… she’s a human being, and she made an UNINTENTIONAL mistake.

I’ve read where Laura’s been called lots of things, but I’ve never seen even her most hateful attackers accuse of her being stupid…. and Ark is an uber genius rocket surgeon or something like that. If these two very intelligent people had decided to INTENTIONALLY run a Raffle Scam it would not have turned into such a lawyer feeding frenzy because the ending would have been a pre-planned part of the con.

I’ve seen dozens of raffle scams over the years, and they’re one of the simplest cons to pull off…. any moron can do it. The scammers have a faithful follower (or even a sock puppet on the Net) gleefully posting “I won, I won” all over the web. Grand prize (car, house, etc) changes title to an anonymous corporation in Delaware… and that’s that. This didn’t happen, which tells me there was no intent to defraud anyone.

Then there’s the total lack of evidence of the alleged intentional scam. I did a complete search for any pending criminal and/or civil actions against Laura Knight-Jadczyk, Arkadiusz Jadczyk, the Cassiopaean group, Quantum Future School, etc. There are NONE. I did a complete search for anyone holding a raffle ticket who asked for a refund and didn’t get it. I found NONE. There was no raffle “scam” and there were no “victims” …just a fouled up fundraiser that didn’t turn out the way anyone planned, especially Laura.

Reality check folks… the more you try to do in this world, the more often you mess something up. Group Leadership Rule #101: If at first you do succeed, try not to look surprised.

The people who actually purchased raffle tickets to the “seemed like a good idea at the time” fundraiser know and accept honest mistakes as a fact of life, and they don’t hold Laura and Ark to some unreasonable standard of perfection. Members bought their tickets to support their group, it’s their money, and not a one of them has brought a verifiable public complaint against their group and/or its leadership. Not one!

If anyone who actually took part in the raffle had a beef with Laura, Ark, the group, school, etc. they could easily write a letter asking for a refund on their ticket, post it on the many slander sites and forum threads….and SIGN THEIR NAME TO IT. A legitimate dissatisfied raffle ticket holder could also file an action in small claims court and post that paper work too.

None of this has happened, check for yourself as I did…. there are NO pending lawsuits and/or outstanding criminal charges against Laura Knight-Jadczyk and/or Arkadiusz Jadczyk! These are LIES being spread all over the Internet by a few mealy mouth butt biscuits like Vincent Bridges, Jay Weidner, and their tiny troop of zombie cheerleaders. They’ve taken an honest mistake that Laura made and apologized for years ago, and twisted it to the point that it’s totally unrecognizable when compared to the actual truth of the matter.

Personally I think Laura should also put “only one majorly messed up fundraiser in 30+ years of activism” on her resume right under “Can kick serious butt when necessary.”
Laura and company are running a huge forum, a high traffic alt news site, a popular breathing program, a hardcopy magazine and a publishing company.
Only ONE fouled up fundraiser in all of that is a pretty darn good track record. With what they’ve got going on, I’d be worried if they didn’t screw something up once and awhile. “Perfect people” creep me out, ’cause you know they’re lying.

Once I’d determined that all the allegations of criminal activity were outright lies, I started looking into some of the random insults being thrown at Laura and her group by the above mentioned trolling turd blossoms.

One common slur that’s routinely hurled against the Cass group is that they are a “cult,” which I found hilarious right off the bat ….until I realized that some bored government official and/or net newbie might actually fall for the sockpuppet slander campaign.
This paragraph is for the noobs… experienced netizens can just skip this part:

“Cults” do not require an Internet connection… in fact most REAL cults do not allow Internet connections so as to keep their members isolated. If a group disappears when your battery level goes below 10% it is not part of a “cult” it is part of a NETWORK called “The Internet.” If you don’t like something you see on the Internet, just turn the damn thing off! Don’t go running all over the place screaming ‘The sky is a cult! The sky is a cult! The sky is a cult!” like chicken spaztard.

Laura, Ark and the Cassiopaea/Quantum Future groups have chosen a CLASSIC organizational structure, the concentric circles model. This is the exact same organizational structure used by every successful, long term Pagan and Heathen group I know of…. and a lot of geek groups use it too. It’s the same basic organizational structure (with slight variations according to culture) used by numerous Indigenous people all across the globe. It’s popular because it works… sorta.

Of course nothing is perfect when people are involved, but there are many of us who believe that the concentric circles structure works better than anything else we’ve tried, so once again, if you don’t like it… just turn the damn thing off!  This is the INTERNET… if you don’t like how a particular group is organized go google up one you do like.

Another popular target of the ratbag brigade is the Ouija Board that’s Laura, Ark, and the group’s chosen method of communication with the “Cassiopaeans”.  I really don’t get the problem here… at least among Pagans and Heathens? A Ouija Board is a tool, and it certainly fits the Cass group ’cause they do dearly love to spell everything out down to the last letter.

I have Heathen friends who use the Runes to communicate with the Aesir and Vanir; Santerian friends who use shells or cocos to communicate with the Orisha; Voodon friends who use bones to communicate with the L’wha; American Indian friends who use a stone on a cord to communicate with the Creator; Strega, Fey and assorted Gaelic friends who use tarot cards to communicate with a longggg list of Gods and Goddesses; and Magician friends who stare into a scrying mirror for hours on end to communicate with who knows what.

Meeting a group of folks who use is Ouija board sorta felt like I’d completed a cosmic communication tool set of some kind. To me, it really doesn’t matter what method a particular sub-culture uses, or what they name whoever they’re talking to, they’re all doing basically the same thing… or at least trying to.

I believe in Gods/Goddesses, Divine Entities, Other Dimensional Beings, etc., whatever a person decides to call them… and I truly do not care what belief structure an individual and/or group chooses. All I ask is that folks pick one and stick with it so I can understand what the heck you’re trying to say.

Laura and the Cass group are actually more truthful than many similar groups in that they don’t even pretend to be certain about who or what they’re chatting with. The words “Cassiopaean EXPERIMENT” are written in large friendly letters at the very top of Laura’s page…. which is a nice way of being honest and saying “No, we’re not really sure about anything either… still working on it”

Newsflash for Noobs #2: If anyone ever tells you they’re absolutely certain about ANYTHING regarding Spirituality, Divine Entities, or Other Dimensional Beings of any kind….RUN! When is person stops questioning themselves is when they get dangerous. Every single culture on this planet has come up with a wide variety of names for a bunch of stuff that not a single one of us is capable of understanding while stuck in these meatsacks. Life and the search for self amounts to one experiment after another, and fussing about the details is just a waste of breath.

My absolute favorite, taken out of context “quote” is one that Jay Weidner claims Laura made regarding her ex-husband. “she believed that a robotic alien had taken over his body.”

My first thought was that even if it’s true, that’s one of the nicer things I’ve heard someone call an ex-spouse.
Compared to what some of my friends have to say about their ex-husbands (and wives) “robotic alien” is almost polite. I have a Yoruban friend who’s convinced that her ex was possessed by an evil spirit… and from what I saw of him, I wouldn’t disagree. Everybody’s got a different way of expressing the same concepts, and I don’t know about the rest of you, but if I were to eliminate all my friends who had something negative to say about their ex-husband/wife, I would be very, very lonely.

Folks, I’ve been a fixture in the Pagan Community, both online and off, for 35+ years, and I’ve seen these kinds of vicious attacks based on bupkis, many, many times before. If I’d found ANY truth to the reams of defamation written about Laura, Ark, and/or their groups, you wouldn’t be reading this statement. You’d be reading what the victims had to say about Laura and Ark on my pages, IF there were any victims… but there aren’t. IMO, there’s nothing going on here but a handful of amoeba minded, vomit spewing, primates with keyboards trash talking about a good woman and her diverse family.

It doesn’t matter how many times I see this kind of crap, it still ticks me off! I’ve read through THOUSANDS of pages where all Laura and her group do is try to help people… for nothing. They don’t charge, even their best “product” the EE breathing program,is available for FREE on the website. The Cass Transcripts are also on their website, for FREE. Their forum and all the advice on it, is FREE. Folks can certainly donate if they want to, but they don’t HAVE to… nothing is denied to people who don’t have any money, and that says a lot.

The sub-human creatures tearing down Laura and her group don’t do jack diddley squat for anyone for free. Go look at their egosites, there’s a price tag hanging on everything but the back button. You can’t even post to their forums without getting a “Click here to enlarge your favorite body part” pop-up.

Now go look at the ads on the Cass forum… oh wait, you can’t, ’cause there aren’t any! They’ve got a high traffic board with a membership in the thousands and they could be using it to rake in some serious cash, but they don’t…. it’s all free. Sometimes when you’re trying to figure out who’s who on the Internet, looking at what a person chooses not to do is as important as paying attention to what they are doing.

There’s just one more Cassio-absurdity I’d like to debunk before I end this saga, and that’s the contention that Laura requires everyone to agree with her, is only interested in attracting followers, etc. etc. In my personal, first hand experience, this is just another big chunk of the Vincent Bridges/Jay Weidner barf bonanza.

I am a Heathen… and I told Laura (and her whole group) this when we first met. I’m a Norse woman and Daughter of Thor… I always have been, and I suspect I always will be. We have 9 Noble Virtues, one word each, and that’s quite enough to suit us. Heathenism doesn’t have an official motto or slogan, but if it did it’d be something along the order of “Will you please just get to the point, ’cause I have things to do”.  Some Heathens can have an entire conversation that consists solely of shoulder shrugs, a few grunts and a little lip pointing. The closest I’ve ever come to engaging in a Heathen “scientific experiment” went something like:

“What’s that?”
“I dunno?”
“Well poke it and see what it does.”
“I’m not gonna poke it, you poke it.”
“Ok, we’ll both poke it together.”
“Ok.”
“1,2…”

I have absolutely no use for science and/or medicine whatsoever, and studying long dead philosophers who like to use big words bores me to tears. I’m of the general opinion that I can gain more personal insight by taking a long walk in the woods, and I always learn more by doing than by reading what someone else says they did…. this is just my nature.

So if Laura has such a problem with people who have a different way of living life than she does, why has she offered me nothing but genuine, non-judgmental friendship since the moment we met? We do share the same basic morals and values, definition of right and wrong in any given situation, desires for ourselves and humanity, stuff like that. …but our chosen paths on the road to awareness really couldn’t be much further apart? We’ve disagreed on a multitude of topics ranging from her favorite author to the effects of aged cheddar on my colon, and not once has she turned into the wicked witch of the west when we did.

I think Laura’s memorized half the history and philosophy literature in Library of Congress, and they’re going to have to add a shelf for the books she’s written. If the stack of dusty books I might get around to reading one day gets any bigger, it’s going to require a building permit from the county. Laura’s dialing up Other Dimensional Beings on a regular basis, whereas I tend to go out of my way to avoid talking to anything that isn’t breathing. Her Statement of Principles is 36 pages long in pdf format… with bookmarks and links and detailed explanations of every single idea. My philosophy consists of nine words, and I have a hard enough time living up to those.

I would officially like to offer myself up as a walking, talking contradiction to the “Laura is intolerant of other beliefs and methods” LIE. If she was, once again… you would not be reading this missive. Laura’s friendship, support, advice and assistance are NOT contingent on agreeing with her particular perspective on the mysteries of life…. and I’m living proof of that. I’m severely allergic to Gurus, and always break out in a serious case of snarky when exposed to one…. my immediate reaction usually involves a hand gesture that requires less than two fingers.

IMO, Laura Knight-Jadczyk is courageous, truthful, honorable, faithful, disciplined, hospitable, industrious, self reliant and persevering. I deeply respect and admire the work she, her husband, and kindred do, and I’m VERY grateful to be able to count them among my friends. Every time I log into the Cass forum I’m amazed by their dedication to helping others, without any expectation of personal gain, and often at great expense to themselves. Like most members I’ve taken great benefit from their research and teachings on everything from psychopathy to my dog’s diet. I feel my life has been greatly enriched, in a wide variety of ways, by getting to know these folks…. and I hope to be learning and laughing with them for a very long time.

If anyone has any questions about anything I’ve written here, please feel free to contact me. My phone# and email address are on my website. Thank you.

Betsy Ashby
Pagan.com

Share

Testimonial of Maryjk_99, Cassiopaean Forum Member

I am actually a latecomer to the Cassiopaea group, having only joined about a year ago.  I was simply seeking answers, an understanding and  truth about why our world is in the state that it is in.  I was looking for the origin of evil, the roots from which it sprang.  Thinking that biblical references were somehow encoded in the text, I came across one of Laura’s articles referencing the Garden of Eden.  I saw how truths were interspersed with lies throughout these texts and I am very grateful for the critical and objective histories she has been able to uncover.

In this past year, I have learned about human history, nutrition and health, science, and have found an alternative news source (Sott.net) which have had a profound effect on my life.  I have learned and am still learning of authors such as Gurdjieff, Mouravieff, Velikovsky,  Casteneda, just to name a few.  I have become acquainted with The Law of One, have taken closer looks at the stories of the Holy Grail along with other mythologies which so affected our ancient ancestors.  In short, I have learned more in this past year than ever in my life.
I have also been exposed to and am still learning psychology from authors such as Martha Stout, Harvey Cleckey  and George K. Simon and have read numerous excerpts of  Lobaczewski’s  life’s work.  Learning from these sources has helped me recognize my own personality and also has helped my everyday life in recognizing and avoiding certain influences in my life.

It has been a fascinating journey, and I have but scratched the surface of all there is to uncover.  I appreciate the work of all the forum members and their willingness to share all that they have learned.  I have never thought the group as a negative entity;  but they are uncovering the negativity and helping all to learn that it does exist and how it affects the lives of each and every one of us.  In short, they give the lie exactly what it deserves, the truth.

Share

Testimonial of Paul Darmawan MBA, Cassiopaean Forum Member

I am and Indonesian, male, 51 years old, divorced and remarried happily, educated with a Master’s Degree in Bus. Adm. from the University of San Fransicso, USA. I have been following Laura and the Cassiopaea Org site for many years and became a member of the Forum for four years.  I cherished the opportunity given to me by the Cosmic Mind to get to know Laura and her works, in revealing and helping my never ending search for the Truth for my and humanity’s purpose of being in this world.

Her experience and straight-froward way of writings, and OMG what a writer she is, captivated me, had convinced me beyond any doubt, that she is pure, honest and unpretentious in wanting to share her channelling results with the Cassiopaeans.  Her finding her true soul mate, Ark, was the blessing she rightfully deserves to make her mission complete.

Both Ark and Laura and the Forum members has given me much to be thankful for, and never have I suspect any ill intention nor wrong doings from the publishings of their work.  All references and research were clear and objectively catalogued.  The internet has certainly open up the world, and Ark and Laura filled it with TRUE INFORMATION needed for humanity to survive to the next level of conciousness, should they chose to do so.

Being the only member from this country, should made me more vigilant in dispersing the truth to my fellow countryman, but alas, this is not USA and freedom of information can be labelled as defamation or worse : an act of blasphemy or terrorism.  I will indirectly strive and keep on trying to convey the messages by the Cassiopaean in this part of the world.

Paul Darmawan, MBA.

Share

Testimonial of Nicklebleu, Medical Doctor, Cassiopaean Forum Member

Laura Knight-Jadczyk, her husband Arkadiusz and the team assembled around the Cassiopaean experiment have recently been criticized on the Internet and been called a “cult”.

For starters, this is an old trick, as far as I know first used by Karl Marx to discredit his political adversaries: “Sektierer” (best translated as “member of a sect”, but with a very negative connotation) he slammed everyone who criticized his theories and psychopathic ramblings.

During the 80′s, the same method was used mainly by leftist circles to discredit conservative individuals and groups – and I had first-hand experience with that, which I will explain in further detail later on.

I was born 1961 into a very conservative Swiss family where the father was the dominant figure. He was politically active on community level and very committed to work, so that I didn’t see much of him when I was young. He died on a mountain excursion when I was sixteen.

What followed were very difficult times for all of the rest of the family: my mother and two sisters. Both of my sisters were taking drugs and I was close to be kicked out of school due to poor marks. With a lot of help from school authorities, teachers, friends and psychologists we were able to finally all get away more or less unscathed, with both myself and my middle sister studying medicine and my youngest sister working in a big insurance company.

From my youngest age I was a voracious reader – I didn’t understand the world around me, myself or other people. I was very timid, especially around girls, but always respected for my quick wit and broad “knowledge”. When I was in my first year at medical school I finally sought the help of psychologists to sort out my problems. What followed, was a long and intense psychotherapy, based on the work of Alfred Adler, also known under depth psychology. This opened up new horizons and I thought that I had finally found some tools to understand the functioning of humans at least a little bit.

The group that provided the psychologists was a loose formation that had been founded by a former pupil of Adler by the name of Friedrich Liebling. He died in the early 80′s and left one of the psychologists at the helm of this group. This group underwent a slow transition from open group, where dissent and discussion was not only tolerated, but openly encouraged, to a group with a more and more monolithic belief system. There was an unspoken hierarchy that was managed by this head woman by praise if you did as expected, and scorn and exclusion for those who didn’t follow.

In the early 90′s the group drifted more and more towards the extreme right. It also became active in the anti-drug liberalization and AIDS political campaigns. This was also the time that this group started to be aggressively attacked in the media as being a “cult”, mainly because they went counter to the prevailing leftist agendas. While there were certainly elements that qualified this group as a cult (like the feeling that “we are right, and everyone else is wrong”, the lack of open discussion and a strongly hierarchical structure), there was nonetheless no pressure to stay with the group. I finally left this group towards the end of the 90′s and emigrated to Australia.

In retrospect I must say that I learned a lot from that group: Not only did this open my eyes to all the political machinations and injustice in our world, but it also helped me sort out many personal problems and deficiencies to be able to lead an independent and fulfilling life.

Then happened 9/11, and this was the first time that I thought that I could perceive a hidden power that was shaping our world, that so far I had not perceived before. It was the first time that I got a glimpse of the “Man behind the Curtain”. Now firmly established in the Internet age I scoured the net for more information that often was not available elsewhere – what a treasure trove! But at the same time I also realized, that you had to take all that information with more than just a grain of salt, because clearly a lot of persons were posting news on the net with very differing agendas.

I also started to investigate nutrition – and that’s how I finally found my way to SOTT. I literally “Stumbled Upon” it – with “help” of the Internet engine, which presents you with random websites according to your interests. And I had to stumble upon the same website twice, before I finally clicked that link.

I was instantly mesmerized and read the Wave Series online. I also straightaway ordered the Wave books. What a new world opened up before my eyes! Laura was a fearless searcher for the truth, but also a person with a tremendous amount of knowledge, a knack for cross-linking information – and a great sense of humor.

At first I was a bit skeptical of the fact that she seemed to get some information from “channeled” sources – from the C’s, as she called them. I was firmly entrenched in Newtonian-Cartesian thinking, suspicious of all this New Age world of crystals, homeopathy and “spirituality”, but the depth of the information and also the poetic and humorous nature of the transmissions led me to have a fresh look at the C’s. And their track record WAS quite impressive.

Finding SOTT has truly changed my life – I have been active on the forum community and in the translation group since early 2008. I have learned more about life and our planet, about the functioning of human beings, about spirituality, nutrition, health, psychopathy, history, archaeology, science and our possible futures, than in the 40 odd years before. Not only that – I have come to the realization, that 95% of things that I believed to be true, were in fact lies and propaganda. Laura and her team have truly “opened my eyes and my heart”. While I often despair of all the negativity, the cruelty and the dark clouds accumulating in our world, Laura and the C’s have given me a fresh perspective. Everything that happens does so for a reason: It is a lesson, from which we all can learn and grow. It’s not just the cold and impersonal universe or random misfortunes that befall us human beings. Just this realization has given me scope and hope for our future – as bleak as it might seem to us now.

I am a person who spent over 10 years in a cult-like environment, so I know how that feels. To ascribe “cultish” behaviors or structures to Laura and her team is pure nonsense – in fact I suppose it is directed with the same sick precision of the psychopath towards those forces that might oppose them – exactly the way it happened with that other group I used to be part of.

I can only encourage everyone to look with their own eyes and feel with their own heart. After all – just follow one of Laura’s mottos: “Don’t believe anything – think for yourself!”

Share